Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22357552›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2012

Neurological disorders and the potential role for stem cells as a therapy.

Paul R Sanberg, David J Eve, L Eduardo Cruz, Cesar V Borlongan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul R SanbergCenter of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Repair, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. psanberg@health.usf.edu
David J Eve
L Eduardo Cruz
Cesar V Borlongan
University of South Florida · US

Funding

Blood-Brain Barrier Repair in Cell Therapy for StrokeR01NS071956 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V, GARBUZOVA-DAVIS, SVITLANA NICOLAI · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS071956-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Neurological disorders are routinely characterized by loss of cells in response to an injury or a progressive insult. Stem cells could therefore be useful to treat these disorders. Sources of data Pubmed searches of recent literature. Areas of agreement Stem cells exhibit proliferative capacity making them ideally suited for replacing dying cells. However, instead of cell replacement therapy stem cell transplants frequently appear to work via neurotrophic factor release, immunomodulation and upregulation of endogenous stem cells. Areas of controversy and areas timely for developing research Many questions remain with respect to the use of stem cells as a therapy, the answers to which will vary depending on the disorder to be treated and mode of action. Whereas the potential tumorigenic capability of stem cells is a concern, most studies do not support this notion. Further determination of the optimal cell type, and whether to perform allogeneic or autologous transplants warrant investigation before the full potential of stem cells can be realized. In addition, the use of stem cells to develop disease models should not be overlooked.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCell Transformation, NeoplasticClinical Trials as TopicHumansNervous System DiseasesStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID22357552
PMCPMC3577100
OpenAlexW2098407201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.