Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22357505›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2012

Biomedical mass spectrometry in today's and tomorrow's clinical microbiology laboratories.

Alex van Belkum, Martin Welker, Marcel Erhard, Sonia Chatellier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Infection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. How many human proteoforms are there?Nature chemical biology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Comparison of MALDI-TOF MS and AFLP for strain typing of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rapid detection of carbapenemase activity: benefits and weaknesses of MALDI-TOF MS.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Multi-center evaluation of the VITEK® MS system for mass spectrometric identification of non-Enterobacteriaceae Gram-negative bacilli.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex van BelkumbioMérieux SA, R&D Microbiology, La Balme Grottes, France. alex.vanbelkum@biomerieux.com
Martin Welker
Marcel Erhard
Sonia Chatellier
bioMérieux (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical microbiology is a conservative laboratory exercise where base technologies introduced in the 19th century remained essentially unaltered. High-tech mass spectrometry (MS) has changed that. Within a few years following its adaptation to microbiological diagnostics, MS has been introduced, embraced, and broadly accepted by clinical microbiology laboratories throughout the world as an innovative tool for definitive bacterial species identification. Herein, we review the current state of the art with respect to this exciting new technology and discuss potential future applications.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesHumansMass SpectrometryMicrobiological Techniques

Identifiers

PMID22357505
PMCPMC3347093
OpenAlexW2055212262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.