ReviewJournal of biosciences2012
Recent advances in development of marker-free transgenic plants: regulation and biosafety concern.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.
- T-DNA orientation, distance between two T-DNAs, and the transformation target cells significantly impact vector backbone integration and efficiency of generating marker-free transgenic plants in a co-transformation system.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Application of a multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 strategy for elimination of selection markers from transgenic plants.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Article
- Exit, O Sodium!Function (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Engineered Expression of Vip3A in Green Tissues as a Feasible Approach for the Control of Insect Pests in Maize.Insects · 2023Article
- A DEAD box helicase Psp68 positively regulates salt stress responses in marker-free transgenic rice plants.Transgenic research · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in Antibiotic-Free Markers; Novel Technologies to Enhance Safe Human Food Production in the World.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Review
- Review
- Effect of marker-free transgenic Chlamydomonas on the control of Aedes mosquito population and on plankton.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Methods of crop improvement and applications towards fortifying food security.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Genetically modified foods: bibliometric analysis on consumer perception and preference.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- Engineering an oilseed crop for hyper-accumulation of carotenoids in the seeds without using a traditional marker gene.Plant cell reports · 2022Article
- Marker-Free Rice (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Construction of gene modification system with highly efficient and markerless forFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- A Strategy for the Production and Molecular Validation of Agrobacterium-Mediated Intragenic Octoploid Strawberry.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Characterization of an algal phosphomannose isomerase gene and its application as a selectable marker for genetic manipulation of tomato.Plant diversity · 2021Article
- Article
- Generation of Marker-Free Transgenic Rice Resistant to Rice Blast Disease UsingFrontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Detection of genetically modified maize in Jordan.GM crops & food · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the efficient genetic transformation of plants with the gene of interest, some selectable marker genes are also used in order to identify the transgenic plant cells or tissues. Usually, antibiotic- or herbicide-selective agents and their corresponding resistance genes are used to introduce economically valuable genes into crop plants. From the biosafety authority and consumer viewpoints, the presence of selectable marker genes in released transgenic crops may be transferred to weeds or pathogenic microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract or soil, making them resistant to treatment with herbicides or antibiotics, respectively. Sexual crossing also raises the problem of transgene expression because redundancy of transgenes in the genome may trigger homology-dependent gene silencing. The future potential of transgenic technologies for crop improvement depends greatly on our abilities to engineer stable expression of multiple transgenic traits in a predictable fashion and to prevent the transfer of undesirable transgenic material to non-transgenic crops and related species. Therefore, it is now essential to develop an efficient marker-free transgenic system. These considerations underline the development of various approaches designed to facilitate timely elimination of transgenes when their function is no longer needed. Due to the limiting number of available selectable marker genes, in future the stacking of transgenes will be increasingly desirable. The production of marker-free transgenic plants is now a critical requisite for their commercial deployment and also for engineering multiple and complex trait. Here we describe the current technologies to eliminate the selectable marker genes (SMG) in order to develop marker-free transgenic plants and also discuss the regulation and biosafety concern of genetically modified (GM) crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.