Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22356640›Full record

SynthesisAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2012

Systematic review: cardiovascular safety profile of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders.

J Tack, M Camilleri, L Chang, W D Chey, J J Galligan, B E Lacy, S Müller-Lissner, E M M Quigley, J Schuurkes, J H De Maeyer and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 121 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
121citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

121 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 271 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Clebopride stimulates 5-HTNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Pharmacologic Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Predominant Constipation].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Review
  20. Pharmacologic treatments for gastroparesis.Pharmacological reviews · 2025
    Review

61 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

J TackDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Leuven, Belgium. jan.tack@med.kuleuven.be
M Camilleri
L Chang
W D Chey
J J Galligan
B E Lacy
S Müller-Lissner
E M M Quigley
J Schuurkes
J H De Maeyer
V Stanghellini
AZ Turnhout · BEDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USKU Leuven · BEMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMichigan State University · USPark-Klinik Weißensee · DEUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nonselective 5-HT(4) receptor agonists, cisapride and tegaserod have been associated with cardiovascular adverse events (AEs).

aimTo perform a systematic review of the safety profile, particularly cardiovascular, of 5-HT(4) agonists developed for gastrointestinal disorders, and a nonsystematic summary of their pharmacology and clinical efficacy.

methodsArticles reporting data on cisapride, clebopride, prucalopride, mosapride, renzapride, tegaserod, TD-5108 (velusetrag) and ATI-7505 (naronapride) were identified through a systematic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Toxfile. Abstracts from UEGW 2006-2008 and DDW 2008-2010 were searched for these drug names, and pharmaceutical companies approached to provide unpublished data.

resultsRetrieved articles on pharmacokinetics, human pharmacodynamics and clinical data with these 5-HT(4) agonists, are reviewed and summarised nonsystematically. Articles relating to cardiac safety and tolerability of these agents, including any relevant case reports, are reported systematically. Two nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists had reports of cardiovascular AEs: cisapride (QT prolongation) and tegaserod (ischaemia). Interactions with, respectively, the hERG cardiac potassium channel and 5-HT(1) receptor subtypes have been suggested to account for these effects. No cardiovascular safety concerns were reported for the newer, selective 5-HT(4) agonists prucalopride, velusetrag, naronapride, or for nonselective 5-HT(4) agonists with no hERG or 5-HT(1) affinity (renzapride, clebopride, mosapride).

conclusions5-HT(4) agonists for GI disorders differ in chemical structure and selectivity for 5-HT(4) receptors. Selectivity for 5-HT(4) over non-5-HT(4) receptors may influence the agent's safety and overall risk-benefit profile. Based on available evidence, highly selective 5-HT(4) agonists may offer improved safety to treat patients with impaired GI motility.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesCisaprideGastrointestinal AgentsGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansIndolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSerotonin 5-HT4 Receptor AgonistsCisaprideGastrointestinal AgentsIndolesSerotonin 5-HT4 Receptor Agoniststegaserod

Identifiers

PMID22356640
PMCPMC3491670
OpenAlexW2075335843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.