Colonoscopy as a triage screening test.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Adenoma detection rate as a quality indicator for colonoscopy: a descriptive cross-sectional study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.Endoscopy international open · 2020
   Article
2. Adenoma Detection Rate: Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2017
   Article
3. Rationale and design of the European Polyp Surveillance (EPoS) trials.Endoscopy · 2016
   Article
4. Surveillance of colonic polyps: Are we getting it right?World journal of gastroenterology · 2016
   Review
5. Overexpression of PTP1B in human colorectal cancer and its association with tumor progression and prognosis.Journal of molecular histology · 2014
   Article
6. Endoscopic colorectal cancer screening provides long-lasting effect.United European gastroenterology journal · 2013
   Article
7. Microbial dysbiosis and colon carcinogenesis: could colon cancer be considered a bacteria-related disease?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2013
   Article
8. Screening, case finding or primary cancer prevention in the developing world?European journal of epidemiology · 2013
   Article
9. Gastrointestinal cancer: Should colonoscopy be a primary test in CRC screening?Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Colorectal-cancer screening.2012
• Comment on
  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths.2012
• Comment on
  Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening.2012

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as