Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22356290›Full record

ReviewDrugs2012

Rilpivirine.

Mark Sanford

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Scaffold hopping yields novel furo[3,2-Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Article
  3. Evolution of Antiretroviral Drug Rilpivirine and Approach to Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mark SanfordAdis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rilpivirine is an orally administered, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is a component drug in combination therapy for antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV-1 infection. The randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multinational ECHO and THRIVE trials in antiretroviral-naive adult patients with HIV-1 infection compared rilpivirine with efavirenz, administered with background nucleoside/nucleotide antiretroviral regimens. Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily recipients had a treatment response (confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level of <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks; primary endpoint) that was noninferior to that of efavirenz 600 mg once daily recipients. The response rates in the rilpivirine and efavirenz groups were 83% and 84% (ECHO) and 87% and 83% (THRIVE). Virological failure rates in rilpivirine and efavirenz groups in the intent-to-treat analysis were 11% and 4% in the ECHO trial and 7% and 5% in the THRIVE trial. In a pooled analysis of both trials, in rilpivirine recipients with an HIV-1 RNA level of >100,000 copies/mL at baseline, the virological failure rate at 48 weeks was 15% (vs 6% with efavirenz), whereas in those with a level of ≤100,000 copies/mL, the virological failure rate was 4% (vs 3% with efavirenz). In general, rilpivirine was better tolerated than efavirenz throughout treatment. Rilpivirine recipients had significantly fewer treatment-related adverse events, discontinuations because of adverse events, psychiatric-neurological adverse events and a significantly lower rate of blood lipid abnormalities.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Reverse TranscriptaseHumansNitrilesPyrimidinesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRilpivirineTreatment OutcomeViral LoadAnti-HIV AgentsHIV Reverse TranscriptaseNitrilesPyrimidinesRilpivirine

Identifiers

PMID22356290
OpenAlexW3191732739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.