ReviewDrugs2012
Rilpivirine.
Review in Drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rational scaffold discovery for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors via integrated in silico approaches.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Scaffold hopping yields novel furo[3,2-Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Article
- Evolution of Antiretroviral Drug Rilpivirine and Approach to Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Pharmacokinetics and Drug-Drug Interactions of Long-Acting Intramuscular Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2021Review
- Article
- Development and validation of a simple and isocratic reversed-phase HPLC method for the determination of rilpivirine from tablets, nanoparticles and HeLa cell lysates.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2015Article
- Review
- Emtricitabine/rilpivirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate single-tablet regimen: a guide to its use in HIV-1 infection.Clinical drug investigation · 2012Article
- Etravirine: a review of its use in the management of treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 infection.Drugs · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rilpivirine is an orally administered, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is a component drug in combination therapy for antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV-1 infection. The randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multinational ECHO and THRIVE trials in antiretroviral-naive adult patients with HIV-1 infection compared rilpivirine with efavirenz, administered with background nucleoside/nucleotide antiretroviral regimens. Rilpivirine 25 mg once daily recipients had a treatment response (confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA level of <50 copies/mL at 48 weeks; primary endpoint) that was noninferior to that of efavirenz 600 mg once daily recipients. The response rates in the rilpivirine and efavirenz groups were 83% and 84% (ECHO) and 87% and 83% (THRIVE). Virological failure rates in rilpivirine and efavirenz groups in the intent-to-treat analysis were 11% and 4% in the ECHO trial and 7% and 5% in the THRIVE trial. In a pooled analysis of both trials, in rilpivirine recipients with an HIV-1 RNA level of >100,000 copies/mL at baseline, the virological failure rate at 48 weeks was 15% (vs 6% with efavirenz), whereas in those with a level of ≤100,000 copies/mL, the virological failure rate was 4% (vs 3% with efavirenz). In general, rilpivirine was better tolerated than efavirenz throughout treatment. Rilpivirine recipients had significantly fewer treatment-related adverse events, discontinuations because of adverse events, psychiatric-neurological adverse events and a significantly lower rate of blood lipid abnormalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.