Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22355593›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2011

Application and comparison of large-scale solution-based DNA capture-enrichment methods on ancient DNA.

María C Avila-Arcos, Enrico Cappellini, J Alberto Romero-Navarro, Nathan Wales, J Víctor Moreno-Mayar, Morten Rasmussen, Sarah L Fordyce, Rafael Montiel, Jean-Philippe Vielle-Calzada, Eske Willerslev and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Robust Framework for Microbial Archaeology.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Human evolution: a tale from ancient genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Barcoding the largest animals on Earth: ongoing challenges and molecular solutions in the taxonomic identification of ancient cetaceans.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

María C Avila-ArcosCentre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Øster Voldgade 5-7, 1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Enrico Cappellini
J Alberto Romero-Navarro
Nathan Wales
J Víctor Moreno-Mayar
Morten Rasmussen
Sarah L Fordyce
Rafael Montiel
Jean-Philippe Vielle-Calzada
Eske Willerslev
M Thomas P Gilbert

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of second-generation sequencing technologies has greatly benefitted the field of ancient DNA (aDNA). Its application can be further exploited by the use of targeted capture-enrichment methods to overcome restrictions posed by low endogenous and contaminating DNA in ancient samples. We tested the performance of Agilent's SureSelect and Mycroarray's MySelect in-solution capture systems on Illumina sequencing libraries built from ancient maize to identify key factors influencing aDNA capture experiments. High levels of clonality as well as the presence of multiple-copy sequences in the capture targets led to biases in the data regardless of the capture method. Neither method consistently outperformed the other in terms of average target enrichment, and no obvious difference was observed either when two tiling designs were compared. In addition to demonstrating the plausibility of capturing aDNA from ancient plant material, our results also enable us to provide useful recommendations for those planning targeted-sequencing on aDNA.

Indexed as

DNA, PlantPlantsPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID22355593
PMCPMC3216561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.