Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22355571›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2011

Drug-target network in myocardial infarction reveals multiple side effects of unrelated drugs.

Francisco J Azuaje, Lu Zhang, Yvan Devaux, Daniel R Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Systematically Investigating the Pharmacological Mechanism ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Network medicine in Cardiovascular Research.Cardiovascular research · 2021
    Review
  9. Study on the Sleep-Improvement Effects ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francisco J AzuajeLaboratory of Cardiovascular Research, Public Research Centre for Health (CRP-Santé), 120 route d'Arlon, L-1150 Luxembourg, Luxembourg. Francisco.Azuaje@crp-sante.lu
Lu Zhang
Yvan Devaux
Daniel R Wagner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The systems-level characterization of drug-target associations in myocardial infarction (MI) has not been reported to date. We report a computational approach that combines different sources of drug and protein interaction information to assemble the myocardial infarction drug-target interactome network (My-DTome). My-DTome comprises approved and other drugs interlinked in a single, highly-connected network with modular organization. We show that approved and other drugs may both be highly connected and represent network bottlenecks. This highlights influential roles for such drugs on seemingly unrelated targets and pathways via direct and indirect interactions. My-DTome modules are associated with relevant molecular processes and pathways. We find evidence that these modules may be regulated by microRNAs with potential therapeutic roles in MI. Different drugs can jointly impact a module. We provide systemic insights into cardiovascular effects of non-cardiovascular drugs. My-DTome provides the basis for an alternative approach to investigate new targets and multidrug treatment in MI.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularCardiotonic AgentsComputer SimulationDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansMyocardial InfarctionCardiotonic Agents

Identifiers

PMID22355571
PMCPMC3216539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.