Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22355329›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

PIPS: pathogenicity island prediction software.

Siomar C Soares, Vinícius A C Abreu, Rommel T J Ramos, Louise Cerdeira, Artur Silva, Jan Baumbach, Eva Trost, Andreas Tauch, Raphael Hirata, Ana L Mattos-Guaraldi and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Reveals Changes in the BenchmarkFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Computational methods for predicting genomic islands in microbial genomes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Siomar C SoaresDepartment of General Biology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Vinícius A C Abreu
Rommel T J Ramos
Louise Cerdeira
Artur Silva
Jan Baumbach
Eva Trost
Andreas Tauch
Raphael Hirata
Ana L Mattos-Guaraldi
Anderson Miyoshi
Vasco Azevedo
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Pará · BRBielefeld University · DEUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRMax Planck Institute for Informatics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adaptability of pathogenic bacteria to hosts is influenced by the genomic plasticity of the bacteria, which can be increased by such mechanisms as horizontal gene transfer. Pathogenicity islands play a major role in this type of gene transfer because they are large, horizontally acquired regions that harbor clusters of virulence genes that mediate the adhesion, colonization, invasion, immune system evasion, and toxigenic properties of the acceptor organism. Currently, pathogenicity islands are mainly identified in silico based on various characteristic features: (1) deviations in codon usage, G+C content or dinucleotide frequency and (2) insertion sequences and/or tRNA genetic flanking regions together with transposase coding genes. Several computational techniques for identifying pathogenicity islands exist. However, most of these techniques are only directed at the detection of horizontally transferred genes and/or the absence of certain genomic regions of the pathogenic bacterium in closely related non-pathogenic species. Here, we present a novel software suite designed for the prediction of pathogenicity islands (pathogenicity island prediction software, or PIPS). In contrast to other existing tools, our approach is capable of utilizing multiple features for pathogenicity island detection in an integrative manner. We show that PIPS provides better accuracy than other available software packages. As an example, we used PIPS to study the veterinary pathogen Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, in which we identified seven putative pathogenicity islands.

Indexed as

SoftwareBacteriaBacterial InfectionsComputational BiologyGenome, BacterialGenomic IslandsVirulence

Identifiers

PMID22355329
PMCPMC3280268
OpenAlexW2031487259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.