Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22355140›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

The distribution of ligand-binding pockets around protein-protein interfaces suggests a general mechanism for pocket formation.

Mu Gao, Jeffrey Skolnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comprehensive chemo-profiling of coumarins enriched extract derived fromSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  14. Structural insights into the interaction of three Y-shaped ligands with PI3Kα.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating Biofilm Inhibitory Potential in Fish Pathogen,Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Catalysis and Electron Transfer inChemical reviews · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mu GaoCenter for the Study of Systems Biology, School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 250 14th Street NW, Atlanta, GA 30318, USA.
Jeffrey Skolnick

Funding

Interaction Pattern Based Predictor of Protein StruturesR01GM048835 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1994 to 2015
$4.0M
THEORY OF FOLDING TRANSITIONS IN A-HELICAL PROTEINSR01GM037408 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKOLNICK, JEFFREY · 1987 to 2014
$3.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-37408NIGMS NIH HHS GM-48835NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037408NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM048835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein and protein-ligand interactions are ubiquitous in a biological cell. Here, we report a comprehensive study of the distribution of protein-ligand interaction sites, namely ligand-binding pockets, around protein-protein interfaces where protein-protein interactions occur. We inspected a representative set of 1,611 representative protein-protein complexes and identified pockets with a potential for binding small molecule ligands. The majority of these pockets are within a 6 Å distance from protein interfaces. Accordingly, in about half of ligand-bound protein-protein complexes, amino acids from both sides of a protein interface are involved in direct contacts with at least one ligand. Statistically, ligands are closer to a protein-protein interface than a random surface patch of the same solvent accessible surface area. Similar results are obtained in an analysis of the ligand distribution around domain-domain interfaces of 1,416 nonredundant, two-domain protein structures. Furthermore, comparable sized pockets as observed in experimental structures are present in artificially generated protein complexes, suggesting that the prominent appearance of pockets around protein interfaces is mainly a structural consequence of protein packing and thus, is an intrinsic geometric feature of protein structure. Nature may take advantage of such a structural feature by selecting and further optimizing for biological function. We propose that packing nearby protein-protein or domain-domain interfaces is a major route to the formation of ligand-binding pockets.

Indexed as

LigandsAlgorithmsAnimalsComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinDimerizationHumansModels, MolecularModels, StatisticalMolecular ConformationProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MappingProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22355140
PMCPMC3309739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.