Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22354996›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2012

Distinct roles of Mus81, Yen1, Slx1-Slx4, and Rad1 nucleases in the repair of replication-born double-strand breaks by sister chromatid exchange.

Sandra Muñoz-Galván, Cristina Tous, Miguel G Blanco, Erin K Schwartz, Kirk T Ehmsen, Stephen C West, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer, Andrés Aguilera

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. DNA damage checkpoint and repair: From the budding yeastComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Break induced replication in eukaryotes: mechanisms, functions, and consequences.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sandra Muñoz-GalvánCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa, Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Seville, Spain.
Cristina Tous
Miguel G Blanco
Erin K Schwartz
Kirk T Ehmsen
Stephen C West
Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Andrés Aguilera
University of California, Davis · USCancer Research UK · GBUniversidad de Sevilla · ESCentro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa · ES

Funding

RECOMBINATIONAL MECHANISMS OF DNA REPAIR IN EUKARYOTESR01GM058015 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI HEYER, WOLF-DIETRICH · 2000 to 2025
$8.8M
Cancer Research UK 11582NIGMS NIH HHS GM58015NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most spontaneous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise during replication and are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) with the sister chromatid. Many proteins participate in HR, but it is often difficult to determine their in vivo functions due to the existence of alternative pathways. Here we take advantage of an in vivo assay to assess repair of a specific replication-born DSB by sister chromatid recombination (SCR). We analyzed the functional relevance of four structure-selective endonucleases (SSEs), Yen1, Mus81-Mms4, Slx1-Slx4, and Rad1, on SCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Physical and genetic analyses showed that ablation of any of these SSEs leads to a specific SCR decrease that is not observed in general HR. Our work suggests that Yen1, Mus81-Mms4, Slx4, and Rad1, but not Slx1, function independently in the cleavage of intercrossed DNA structures to reconstitute broken replication forks via HR with the sister chromatid. These unique effects, which have not been detected in other studies unless double mutant combinations were used, indicate the formation of distinct alternatives for the repair of replication-born DSBs that require specific SSEs.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairSister Chromatid ExchangeDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesFlap EndonucleasesHolliday Junction ResolvasesMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, FungalDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesFlap EndonucleasesHolliday Junction ResolvasesMMS4 protein, S cerevisiaeMUS81 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD1 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSLX1 protein, S cerevisiaeSLX4 protein, S cerevisiaeYen1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22354996
PMCPMC3347241
OpenAlexW2152159606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.