Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22354778›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2012

Comparative analysis of the Vitek 2 antifungal susceptibility system and E-test with the CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Indian clinical isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans.

Aarti Tewari, Bijayani Behera, Purva Mathur, Immaculata Xess

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aarti TewariDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Bijayani Behera
Purva Mathur
Immaculata Xess
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of antifungal resistance among Cryptococcus neoformans isolates is a matter of great concern. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution reference method (BMD) for antifungal susceptibility testing of C. neoformans is tedious and time-consuming. Consequently, there is a greater need for a reproducible in vitro susceptibility testing method for use in clinical microbiology laboratories. By random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis, the 62 Indian clinical isolates were characterized as Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii. We evaluated the susceptibilities of these isolates for amphotericin B (AMB) and fluconazole (FLC) by two commercial techniques, i.e., Vitek 2 and E-test against the CLSI M27-A3 BMD. The essential agreement (EA) between the Vitek 2 and E-test with the reference procedure for FLC was similar (82.2%). For AMB, EA of 92 and 76% was obtained with E-test and Vitek 2. Excellent categorical agreement (CA) (98.3% and 100% by Vitek 2 and E-test, respectively) was obtained for AMB. The CA for FLC was 81 and 77.4% by Vitek 2 and E-test. We conclude that both E-test and Vitek 2 system have acceptable levels of accuracy for susceptibility testing of both the drugs. Both of them could identify fluconazole-resistant strains. Vitek 2 could be used for testing susceptibility of voriconazole and 5-flucytosine also at the same time.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCryptococcosisCryptococcus neoformansHumansIndiaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID22354778
OpenAlexW2052421693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.