SynthesisEuropean radiology2012
Do brain image databanks support understanding of normal ageing brain structure? A systematic review.
Synthesis in European radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- NOWinBRAIN: a Large, Systematic, and Extendable Repository of 3D Reconstructed Images of a Living Human Brain Cum Head and Neck.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- The Whole Picture: From Isolated to Global MRI Measures of Neurovascular and Neurodegenerative Disease.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2019Review
- Predicting age from cortical structure across the lifespan.The European journal of neuroscience · 2018Article
- Article
- Self-Trained Supervised Segmentation of Subcortical Brain Structures Using Multispectral Magnetic Resonance Images.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.PloS one · 2015Article
- Variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality.PloS one · 2013Article
- Making better use of our brain MRI research data.European radiology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo document accessible magnetic resonance (MR) brain images, metadata and statistical results from normal older subjects that may be used to improve diagnoses of dementia.
methodsWe systematically reviewed published brain image databanks (print literature and Internet) concerned with normal ageing brain structure.
resultsFrom nine eligible databanks, there appeared to be 944 normal subjects aged ≥60 years. However, many subjects were in more than one databank and not all were fully representative of normal ageing clinical characteristics. Therefore, there were approximately 343 subjects aged ≥60 years with metadata representative of normal ageing, but only 98 subjects were openly accessible. No databank had the range of MR image sequences, e.g. T2*, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), required to effectively characterise the features of brain ageing. No databank supported random subject retrieval; therefore, manual selection bias and errors may occur in studies that use these subjects as controls. Finally, no databank stored results from statistical analyses of its brain image and metadata that may be validated with analyses of further data.
conclusionBrain image databanks require open access, more subjects, metadata, MR image sequences, searchability and statistical results to improve understanding of normal ageing brain structure and diagnoses of dementia. KEY POINTS: • We reviewed databanks with structural MR brain images of normal older people. • Among these nine databanks, 98 normal subjects ≥60 years were openly accessible. • None had all the required sequences, random subject retrieval or statistical results. • More access, subjects, sequences, metadata, searchability and results are needed. • These may improve understanding of normal brain ageing and diagnoses of dementia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22354559What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.