ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2013
A Brownian ratchet for protein translocation including dissociation of ratcheting sites.
Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Threading single proteins through pores to compare their energy landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Experimental study of a nanoscale translocation ratchet.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- FusC, a member of the M16 protease family acquired by bacteria for iron piracy against plants.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Two-Partner Secretion: Combining Efficiency and Simplicity in the Secretion of Large Proteins for Bacteria-Host and Bacteria-Bacteria Interactions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017Review
- Sequential unfolding of the hemolysin two-partner secretion domain from Proteus mirabilis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We study a model for the translocation of proteins across membranes through a nanopore using a ratcheting mechanism. When the protein enters the nanopore it diffuses in and out of the pore according to a Brownian motion. Moreover, it is bound by ratcheting molecules which hinder the diffusion of the protein out of the nanopore, i.e. the Brownian motion is reflected such that no ratcheting molecule exits the pore. New ratcheting molecules bind at rate γ. Extending our previous approach (Depperschmidt and Pfaffelhuber in Stoch Processes Appl 120:901-925, 2010) we allow the ratcheting molecules to dissociate (at rate δ) from the protein (Model I). We also provide an approximate model (Model II) which assumes a Poisson equilibrium of ratcheting molecules on one side of the current reflection boundary. Using analytical methods and simulations we show that the speeds of both models are approximately the same. Our analytical results on Model II give the speed of translocation by means of a solution of an ordinary differential equation. This speed gives an approximation for the time it takes to translocate a protein of given length.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22354539What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.