ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2012
Homology modeling of the human 5-HT1A, 5-HT 2A, D1, and D2 receptors: model refinement with molecular dynamics simulations and docking evaluation.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biophysical insights into OR2T7: Investigation of a potential prognostic marker for glioblastoma.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Overcoming Depression with 5-HTInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Mechanism Exploration of Arylpiperazine Derivatives Targeting the 5-HTMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Article
- Insights into the influence of 5-HT2c aminoacidic variants with the inhibitory action of serotonin inverse agonists and antagonists.Journal of molecular modeling · 2014Article
- Article
- Homology modeling of dopamine D2 and D3 receptors: molecular dynamics refinement and docking evaluation.PloS one · 2012Article
- Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine DMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
5-HT(1A) serotonin and D1 dopamine receptor agonists have been postulated to be able to improve negative and cognitive impairment symptoms of schizophrenia, while partial agonists and antagonists of the D2 and 5-HT(2A) receptors have been reported to be effective in reducing positive symptoms. There is therefore a need for well-defined homology models for the design of more selective antipsychotic agents, since no three-dimensional (3D) crystal structures of these receptors are currently available. In this study, homology models were built based on the high-resolution crystal structure of the β(2)-adrenergic receptor (2RH1) and further refined via molecular dynamics simulations in a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (POPC) lipid bilayer system with the GROMOS96 53A6 united atom force field. Docking evaluations with representative agonists and antagonists using AutoDock 4.2 revealed binding modes in agreement with experimentally determined site-directed mutagenesis data and significant correlations between the computed and experimental pK (i) values. The models are also able to distinguish between antipsychotic agents with different selectivities and binding affinities for the four receptors, as well as to differentiate active compounds from decoys. Hence, these human 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(2A), D1 and D2 receptor homology models are capable of predicting the activities of novel ligands, and can be used as 3D templates for antipsychotic drug design and discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.