ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Objective assessment of nonadherence and unknown co-medication in hospitalized patients.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality, feasibility and patient satisfaction of medication history taking by telephone for patients with scheduled admissions: a pilot study.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Community Pharmacy Interventions on Patients with Medicines Under Additional Monitoring.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2024Article
- Proposal for a new study design and endpoint in research on medication history taking.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2024Article
- Evaluating patients' comprehensibility of a standardized medication plan.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Characteristics of medication schedules used by elderly ambulatory patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015Article
- Effect of a Multi-Dimensional and Inter-Sectoral Intervention on the Adherence of Psychiatric Patients.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe intake of medications (drugs) without the knowledge of the treating physician (unknown co-medication) and nonadherence strongly influence drug safety. The aim of our study was to objectively assess unknown co-medication and nonadherence in hospitalized patients by screening urine for a large number of drugs using highly sensitive full scan gas chromatograpy/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Secondary objectives were to determine the relationship of co-medication and nonadherence to the number of drugs prescribed and to compare history-taking by a pharmacist versus a physician.
methodsIn 152 patients, the drug histories taken by physicians, patients' self-reported adherence, and information compiled during as many as three structured interviews conducted by a trained pharmacist on days 1-2, 3-4, and 7-11 of the hospital stay were compared with the GC/MS results from urine samples collected after each interview.
resultsIn the interviews performed by the pharmacist, 235 additional drugs were identified that were not documented in the chart. Of all the drugs indicated in any interview, 16.9% were identified only by the physician, 24.1% only by the pharmacist, and 59% by both. Overall, in 78% of the patients at least one additional drug was identified by urine screening. The findings suggest overall nonadherence to at least one drug in 13.0% of patients on admission and in 23.3% of patients at any time during hospitalization. Nonadherence was less frequent for critical dose drugs and correlated with the number of prescribed drugs.
conclusionsThe drug history among hospitalized patients is often incomplete, and nonadherence and unknown co-medication are alarmingly frequent. This lack of knowledge might impact the overall success of drug therapies in the hospital setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22354152What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.