ArticleObstetrics and gynecology2012
Trends in cesarean delivery for twin births in the United States: 1995-2008.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.The New England journal of medicine · 2013Trial
- Predicting cesarean delivery in twin pregnancies undergoing trial of labor: a multicenter cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Mode of delivery by an ulcerative colitis mother in a case of twins: Immunological differences in cord blood and placenta.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Perinatal Outcome of Second Twin with Respect to Mode of Delivery: An Observational Study.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016Article
- The impact of changes in preterm birth among twins on stillbirth and infant mortality in the United States.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22353970What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.