Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22353939›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2012

In search of triallelism in Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

Leen Abu-Safieh, Shamsa Al-Anazi, Lama Al-Abdi, Mais Hashem, Hisham Alkuraya, Mushari Alamr, Mugtaba O Sirelkhatim, Zuhair Al-Hassnan, Basim Alkuraya, Jawahir Y Mohamed and 13 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bardet-Biedl syndrome associated with novel compound heterozygous variants in BBS12 gene.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  9. Bardet-Biedl Syndrome: Current Perspectives and Clinical Outlook.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity of primary ciliopathies (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Leen Abu-SafiehDevelopmental Genetics Unit, Department of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Shamsa Al-Anazi
Lama Al-Abdi
Mais Hashem
Hisham Alkuraya
Mushari Alamr
Mugtaba O Sirelkhatim
Zuhair Al-Hassnan
Basim Alkuraya
Jawahir Y Mohamed
Ahmad Al-Salem
May Alrashed
Eissa Faqeih
Ameen Softah
Amal Al-Hashem
Sami Wali
Zuhair Rahbeeni
Moeen Alsayed
Arif O Khan
Lihadh Al-Gazali
Peter E M Taschner
Selwa Al-Hazzaa
Fowzan S Alkuraya
King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKing Fahd Medical City · SARiyadh Armed Forces Hospital · SAKing Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital · SAKing Saud University · SALeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a model disease for ciliopathy in humans. The remarkable genetic heterogeneity that characterizes this disease is consistent with accumulating data on the interaction between the proteins encoded by the 14 BBS genes identified to date. Previous reports suggested that such interaction may also extend to instances of oligogenic inheritance in the form of triallelism which defies the long held view of BBS as an autosomal recessive disease. In order to investigate the magnitude of triallelism in BBS, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of all 14 BBS genes as well as the CCDC28B-modifier gene in a cohort of 29 BBS families, most of which are multiplex. Two in trans mutations in a BBS gene were identified in each of these families for a total of 20 mutations including 12 that are novel. In no instance did we observe two mutations in unaffected members of a given family, or observe the presence of a third allele that convincingly acted as a modifier of penetrance and supported the triallelic model of BBS. In addition to presenting a comprehensive genotype/phenotype overview of a large set of BBS mutations, including the occurrence of nonsyndromic retinitis pigmentosa in a family with a novel BBS9 mutation, our study argues in favor of straightforward autosomal recessive BBS in most cases.

Indexed as

AllelesBardet-Biedl SyndromeCell Cycle ProteinsCohort StudiesCytoskeletal ProteinsFamilyGenes, ModifierHumansMaleCCDC28B protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22353939
PMCPMC3306854
OpenAlexW2079435339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.