ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2012
Bacterial effectors target the plant cell nucleus to subvert host transcription.
Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of candidate nucleomodulins in ESKAPE bacteria -Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The Nuclear Effector RIRG190 Interacts with SAS10 to Regulate Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring the potential role of fourFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- The C-terminal extension of VgrG4 from Klebsiella pneumoniae remodels host cell microfilaments.Proteins · 2022Article
- Solution structure and dynamics of the mitochondrial-targeted GTPase-activating protein (GAP) VopE by an integrated NMR/SAXS approach.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Bacterial nucleomodulins: A coevolutionary adaptation to the eukaryotic command center.PLoS pathogens · 2021Review
- Bacterial nucleomodulins and cancer: An unresolved enigma.Translational oncology · 2021Review
- Two Pantoea agglomerans type III effectors can transform nonpathogenic and phytopathogenic bacteria into host-specific gall-forming pathogens.Molecular plant pathology · 2019Article
- Comparative genomics of chytrid fungi reveal insights into the obligate biotrophic and pathogenic lifestyle of Synchytrium endobioticum.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- A rust fungal effector binds plant DNA and modulates transcription.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Revealing the inventory of type III effectors in Pantoea agglomerans gall-forming pathovars using draft genome sequences and a machine-learning approach.Molecular plant pathology · 2018Article
- Modify the Histone to Win the Battle: Chromatin Dynamics in Plant-Pathogen Interactions.Frontiers in plant science · 2018Review
- Quantitative analysis of the tomato nuclear proteome during Phytophthora capsici infection unveils regulators of immunity.The New phytologist · 2017Article
- LOCALIZER: subcellular localization prediction of both plant and effector proteins in the plant cell.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Behind the lines-actions of bacterial type III effector proteins in plant cells.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2016Review
- Nuclear Function of Subclass I Actin-Depolymerizing Factor Contributes to Susceptibility in Arabidopsis to an Adapted Powdery Mildew Fungus.Plant physiology · 2016Article
- Targeting of host organelles by pathogenic bacteria: a sophisticated subversion strategy.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2016Review
- Article
- HpaP modulates type III effector secretion in Ralstonia solanacearum and harbours a substrate specificity switch domain essential for virulence.Molecular plant pathology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to promote virulence, Gram-negative bacteria have evolved the ability to inject so-called type III effector proteins into host cells. The plant cell nucleus appears to be a subcellular compartment repeatedly targeted by bacterial effectors. In agreement with this observation, mounting evidence suggests that manipulation of host transcription is a major strategy developed by bacteria to counteract plant defense responses. It has been suggested that bacterial effectors may adopt at least three alternative, although not mutually exclusive, strategies to subvert host transcription. T3Es may (1) act as transcription factors that directly activate transcription in host cells, (2) affect histone packing and chromatin configuration, and/or (3) target host transcription factor activity. Here, we provide an overview on how all these strategies may lead to host transcriptional re-programming and, as a result, to improved bacterial multiplication inside plant cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.