Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22353634›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2012

Large positive effect of lithium on prefrontal cortex N-acetylaspartate in patients with bipolar disorder: 2-centre study.

Tomas Hajek, Michael Bauer, Andrea Pfennig, Jeffrey Cullis, Jana Ploch, Claire O'Donovan, Georg Bohner, Randolf Klingebiel, L Trevor Young, Glenda M Macqueen and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Widespread white matter microstructural abnormalities in bipolar disorder: evidence from mega- and meta-analyses across 3033 individuals.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Lithium: current state of the art and future directions.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, and brain structure in bipolar disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Tomas HajekDepartment of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS. tomas.hajek@dal.ca
Michael Bauer
Andrea Pfennig
Jeffrey Cullis
Jana Ploch
Claire O'Donovan
Georg Bohner
Randolf Klingebiel
L Trevor Young
Glenda M Macqueen
Martin Alda
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DECharles University · CZDalhousie University · CANational Institute of Mental Health · CZ

Funding

CIHR 103703CIHR 106469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeuroprotective effects of lithium (Li) have been well documented in tissue cultures and animal models, whereas human data continue to be limited. Previous studies investigating the association between Li treatment and brain N-acetylaspartate (NAA), a putative neuronal marker, showed mixed results because of methodological heterogeneity.

methodsTo investigate the effects of Li on prefrontal cortex NAA levels, we compared patients with bipolar disorder from specialized Li clinics in Berlin and Halifax with at least 2 years of ongoing Li treatment (Li group), patients with lifetime Li exposure of less than 3 months more than 2 years ago (non-Li group) and healthy controls. Participants in both patient groups had at least 10 years of illness and 5 episodes. We measured left prefrontal NAA levels using 1.5-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

resultsWe enrolled 27 participants in the Li, 16 in the non-Li and 21 in the healthy control groups. The non-Li group had lower prefrontal NAA levels than the Li group (t41 = -3.44, corrected p < 0.01) or control participants (t35 = -2.91, corrected p < 0.05), who did not differ from the Li group (t46 = -0.14, p = 0.89). The same pattern of prefrontal NAA differences was replicated in both sites. In addition, there was a negative correlation between prefrontal NAA and duration of illness in the non-Li group (r = -0.60, p = 0.019) but not in the Li group (r = 0.07, p = 0.74). LIMITATIONS: Study limitations include the crosssectional design and exposure to other medications.

conclusionWhereas patients with bipolar disorder, substantial illness burden and limited lifetime Li exposure had significantly lower prefrontal NAA levels than controls, Li-treated patients with similar illness burden showed prefrontal NAA levels comparable to those of healthy controls. These findings provide indirect support for neuroprotective effects of Li and for negative effects of illness burden on prefrontal NAA levels in patients with bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

Neuroprotective AgentsAdultAspartic AcidBipolar DisorderCost of IllnessFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLithium CompoundsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPrefrontal CortexPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAspartic AcidLithium CompoundsN-acetylaspartateNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID22353634
PMCPMC3341410
OpenAlexW2143347219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.