Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22353245›Full record

ArticleGenetics research2012

Extensive epistasis for olfactory behaviour, sleep and waking activity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Shilpa Swarup, Susan T Harbison, Lauren E Hahn, Tatiana V Morozova, Akihiko Yamamoto, Trudy F C Mackay, Robert R H Anholt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The road less traveled: from genotype to phenotype in flies and humans.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Dissecting the Genetic Architecture of Behavior inCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Analysis of natural variation reveals neurogenetic networks for Drosophila olfactory behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shilpa SwarupDepartment of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, 27695-7614, USA.
Susan T Harbison
Lauren E Hahn
Tatiana V Morozova
Akihiko Yamamoto
Trudy F C Mackay
Robert R H Anholt

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Olfaction in DrosophiliaR01GM059469 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1999 to 2016
$5.8M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI IN DROSOPHILAR01GM045146 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI ANHOLT, ROBERT R. H, MACKAY, TRUDY F. · 1991 to 2012
$5.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM45146NIGMS NIH HHS GM59469NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM045146NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epistasis is an important feature of the genetic architecture of quantitative traits, but the dynamics of epistatic interactions in natural populations and the relationship between epistasis and pleiotropy remain poorly understood. Here, we studied the effects of epistatic modifiers that segregate in a wild-derived Drosophila melanogaster population on the mutational effects of P-element insertions in Semaphorin-5C (Sema-5c) and Calreticulin (Crc), pleiotropic genes that affect olfactory behaviour and startle behaviour and, in the case of Crc, sleep phenotypes. We introduced Canton-S B (CSB) third chromosomes with or without a P-element insertion at the Crc or Sema-5c locus in multiple wild-derived inbred lines of the Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and assessed the effects of epistasis on the olfactory response to benzaldehyde and, for Crc, also on sleep. In each case, we found substantial epistasis and significant variation in the magnitude of epistasis. The predominant direction of epistatic effects was to suppress the mutant phenotype. These observations support a previous study on startle behaviour using the same D. melanogaster chromosome substitution lines, which concluded that suppressing epistasis may buffer the effects of new mutations. However, epistatic effects are not correlated among the different phenotypes. Thus, suppressing epistasis appears to be a pervasive general feature of natural populations to protect against the effects of new mutations, but different epistatic interactions modulate different phenotypes affected by mutations at the same pleiotropic gene.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticAnimalsBenzaldehydesCalreticulinChromosomes, InsectDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleGenes, InsectGenetic PleiotropyMaleMembrane GlycoproteinsMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationOdorantsbenzaldehydeBenzaldehydesCalreticulinDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsSema5c protein, DrosophilaSemaphorins

Identifiers

PMID22353245
PMCPMC3283907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.