Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22353031›Full record

SynthesisHealth services research2012

A systematic review of community-based participatory research to enhance clinical trials in racial and ethnic minority groups.

Denise De las Nueces, Karen Hacker, Ann DiGirolamo, LeRoi S Hicks

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04426539 (New IDEAS), which is not on this map. Cited by 210 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
210citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04426539 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

New IDEAS: Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning Study - A Study to Improve Precision in Amyloid PET Coverage and Patient Care

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAmerican College of RadiologyRan2020 to 2024Enrolled6,061ConditionsAlzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

210 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Recruitment of Black Adults into Cardiovascular Disease Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

150 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise De las NuecesCommonwealth Fund/Harvard University Fellowship in Minority Health Policy, 164 Longwood Avenue, 2nd Floor, Boston, MA 02115, USA. ddelasnu@hsph.harvard.edu
Karen Hacker
Ann DiGirolamo
LeRoi S Hicks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effectiveness of current community-based participatory research (CBPR) clinical trials involving racial and ethnic minorities. DATA SOURCE: All published peer-reviewed CBPR intervention articles in PubMed and CINAHL databases from January 2003 to May 2010. STUDY

designWe performed a systematic literature review. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsData were extracted on each study's characteristics, community involvement in research, subject recruitment and retention, and intervention effects. PRINCIPLE

findingsWe found 19 articles meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 were published from 2007 to 2010. Articles described some measures of community participation in research with great variability. Although CBPR trials examined a wide range of behavioral and clinical outcomes, such trials had very high success rates in recruiting and retaining minority participants and achieving significant intervention effects.

conclusionsSignificant publication gaps remain between CBPR and other interventional research methods. CBPR may be effective in increasing participation of racial and ethnic minority subjects in research and may be a powerful tool in testing the generalizability of effective interventions among these populations. CBPR holds promise as an approach that may contribute greatly to the study of health care delivery to disadvantaged populations.

Indexed as

EthnicityRacial GroupsResearch DesignClinical Trials as TopicCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHealth BehaviorHumansOutcome and Process Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID22353031
PMCPMC3418827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.