Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22353027›Full record

Trial reportHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2012

Momentary effects of exposure to prosmoking media on college students' future smoking risk.

William G Shadel, Steven C Martino, Claude Setodji, Deborah Scharf

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-Time Context of Tobacco Marketing Exposure and Community Vulnerability-An Ecological Momentary Assessment Among Young Adults.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of antismoking media on college students' smoking-related beliefs and intentions.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Conceptualizing analyses of ecological momentary assessment data.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Review
  20. Quantifying the persistence of pro-smoking media effects on college students' smoking risk.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William G ShadelRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. shadel@rand.org
Steven C Martino
Claude Setodji
Deborah Scharf

Funding

In Vivo Assessment of Young Adults' Exposure to Cigarette AdvertisingR21CA137286 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI SHADEL, WILLIAM G · 2009 to 2010
$421k
NCI NIH HHS R21CA1237286NCI NIH HHS R21 CA137286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study used ecological momentary assessment to examine acute changes in college students' future smoking risk as a function of their exposure to prosmoking media (e.g., smoking in movies, paid advertising, point-of-sale displays).

methodA sample of 135 college students ("ever" and "never" smokers) carried handheld computers for 21 days, recording their exposures to all forms of prosmoking media during the assessment period. They also responded to three investigator-initiated control prompts during each day of the assessment period (i.e., programmed to occur randomly). After each prosmoking media exposure and after each random control prompt they answered questions that measured their risk of future smoking. Responses between prosmoking media encounters were compared (within subjects) to responses made during random control prompts.

resultsCompliance with the study protocol was high, with participants responding to over 83% of all random prompts. Participants recorded nearly three encounters with prosmoking media each week. Results of linear mixed modeling indicated that all participants had higher future smoking risk following exposure to prosmoking media compared with control prompts (p < .05); this pattern of response did not differ between ever and never smokers (p = .769). Additional modeling of the variances around participants' risk of future smoking revealed that the response of never smokers to prosmoking media was significantly more variable than the response of ever smokers.

conclusionExposure to prosmoking media is associated with acute changes in future smoking risk, and never smokers and ever smokers respond differently to these exposures.

Indexed as

Mass MediaAdolescentAdultAdvertisingComputers, HandheldFemaleForecastingHumansMaleMotion PicturesRiskRisk FactorsSmokingStudentsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22353027
PMCPMC3360140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.