Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22351772›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2012

The Werner syndrome exonuclease facilitates DNA degradation and high fidelity DNA polymerization by human DNA polymerase δ.

Ashwini S Kamath-Loeb, Jiang-Cheng Shen, Michael W Schmitt, Lawrence A Loeb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Induction of action-at-a-distance mutagenesis by 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine in DNA pol λ-knockdown cells.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashwini S Kamath-LoebDepartment of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. laloeb@uw.edu
Jiang-Cheng Shen
Michael W Schmitt
Lawrence A Loeb
University of Washington · US

Funding

Tumor mutation signaturesP01CA077852 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MONNAT, RAYMOND J · 1999 to 2019
$26.0M
Fidelity of DNA SynthesisR01CA102029 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LOEB, LAWRENCE A · 2003 to 2012
$3.3M
Base Excision DNA Repair in Premature Aging and NeurodegenerationZ01AG000751 · NIA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING · PI WILSON, DAVID · 2008 to 2008
$197k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000751NCI NIH HHS P01 CA077852NCI NIH HHS P01-CA77852NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102029NCI NIH HHS R01-CA10209NIA NIH HHS P01-AG0751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA Polymerase δ (Pol δ) and the Werner syndrome protein, WRN, are involved in maintaining cellular genomic stability. Pol δ synthesizes the lagging strand during replication of genomic DNA and also functions in the synthesis steps of DNA repair and recombination. WRN is a member of the RecQ helicase family, loss of which results in the premature aging and cancer-prone disorder, Werner syndrome. Both Pol δ and WRN encode 3' → 5' DNA exonuclease activities. Pol δ exonuclease removes 3'-terminal mismatched nucleotides incorporated during replication to ensure high fidelity DNA synthesis. WRN exonuclease degrades DNA containing alternate secondary structures to prevent formation and enable resolution of stalled replication forks. We now observe that similarly to WRN, Pol δ degrades alternate DNA structures including bubbles, four-way junctions, and D-loops. Moreover, WRN and Pol δ form a complex with enhanced ability to hydrolyze these structures. We also present evidence that WRN can proofread for Pol δ; WRN excises 3'-terminal mismatches to enable primer extension by Pol δ. Consistent with our in vitro observations, we show that WRN contributes to the maintenance of DNA synthesis fidelity in vivo. Cells expressing limiting amounts (∼10% of normal) of WRN have elevated mutation frequencies compared with wild-type cells. Together, our data highlight the importance of WRN exonuclease activity and its cooperativity with Pol δ in preserving genome stability, which is compromised by the loss of WRN in Werner syndrome.

Indexed as

DNA CleavageDNA ReplicationBase PairingBase Pair MismatchCells, CulturedDNADNA Polymerase IIIElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayExodeoxyribonucleasesHumansHydrolysisMultiprotein ComplexesMutagenesisNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingRecQ HelicasesDNADNA Polymerase IIIExodeoxyribonucleasesMultiprotein ComplexesRecQ HelicasesWerner Syndrome HelicaseWRN protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22351772
PMCPMC3320997
OpenAlexW2072467567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.