Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22351647›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2013

Cerebellar processing of sensory inputs primes motor cortex plasticity.

T Popa, B Velayudhan, C Hubsch, S Pradeep, E Roze, M Vidailhet, S Meunier, A Kishore

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Deleterious effects of a low amount of ethanol on LTP-like plasticity in human cortex.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Synergistic Reinforcement Learning by Cooperation of the Cerebellum and Basal Ganglia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

T PopaCentre de NeuroImagerie de Recherche-CENIR, 75013 Paris, France. traian.popa@upmc.fr
B Velayudhan
C Hubsch
S Pradeep
E Roze
M Vidailhet
S Meunier
A Kishore
Sree Chitra Thirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology · INCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute (ACTSI) RenewalUL1TR000454 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHENS, DAVID S · 2012 to 2016
$25.8M
Dystonia CoalitionU54NS065701 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2009 to 2014
$7.0M
Dystonia CoalitionU54TR001456 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JINNAH, HYDER A · 2015 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001456NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000454NINDS NIH HHS NS065701NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plasticity of the human primary motor cortex (M1) has a critical role in motor control and learning. The cerebellum facilitates these functions using sensory feedback. We investigated whether cerebellar processing of sensory afferent information influences the plasticity of the primary motor cortex (M1). Theta-burst stimulation protocols (TBS), both excitatory and inhibitory, were used to modulate the excitability of the posterior cerebellar cortex and to condition an ongoing M1 plasticity. M1 plasticity was subsequently induced in 2 different ways: by paired associative stimulation (PAS) involving sensory processing and TBS that exclusively involves intracortical circuits of M1. Cerebellar excitation attenuated the PAS-induced M1 plasticity, whereas cerebellar inhibition enhanced and prolonged it. Furthermore, cerebellar inhibition abolished the topography-specific response of PAS-induced M1 plasticity, with the effects spreading to adjacent motor maps. Conversely, cerebellar excitation had no effect on the TBS-induced M1 plasticity. This demonstrates the key role of the cerebellum in priming M1 plasticity, and we propose that it is likely to occur at the thalamic or olivo-dentate nuclear level by influencing the sensory processing. We suggest that such a cerebellar priming of M1 plasticity could shape the impending motor command by favoring or inhibiting the recruitment of several muscle representations.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAdultCerebellumElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID22351647
PMCPMC3539453
OpenAlexW2153801261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.