Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22351472›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2012

Validity study of the K6 scale as a measure of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and utilization.

Judith J Prochaska, Hai-Yen Sung, Wendy Max, Yanling Shi, Michael Ong

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05199415 (Fulfillment Center Intervention Study as Part of The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and Wellbeing), which is not on this map. Cited by 454 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
454citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05199415 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Fulfillment Center Intervention Study as Part of The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Center for Work, Health and Wellbeing

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyRan2021 to 2024Enrolled3,459ConditionsPsychological Distress, Psychological Well-being, Subjective Health, InjuriesArmsHealth and Well-being Committee
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

454 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 920 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

394 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith J ProchaskaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, 94143-0984, USA. jprochaska@ucsf.edu
Hai-Yen Sung
Wendy Max
Yanling Shi
Michael Ong
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

TREATMENTS FOR COMPLEX PATIENTS IN NEW SETTINGSP50DA009253 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SORENSEN, JAMES L · 1994 to 2014
$28.2M
The Role of Social Networks in Treatment Engagement for MinoritiesP30MH082760 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MIRANDA, JEANNE · 2008 to 2012
$8.6M
Research ProjectU54CA153499 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI CHEN, MOON SHAO-CHUANG, CHOW, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2015
$6.7M
Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Strategies for Inpatient PsychiatryR01MH083684 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PROCHASKA, JUDITH J. · 2009 to 2013
$2.6M
Treating Tobacco Dependence in Inpatient PsychiatryK23DA018691 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PROCHASKA, JUDITH J. · 2005 to 2009
$769k
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA153499NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA018691NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009253NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA09253NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH082760NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083684
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widely-used Kessler K6 non-specific distress scale screens for severe mental illness defined as a K6 score ≥ 13, estimated to afflict about 6% of US adults. The K6, as currently used, fails to capture individuals struggling with more moderate mental distress that nonetheless warrants mental health intervention. The current study determined a cutoff criterion on the K6 scale indicative of moderate mental distress based on mental health treatment need and assessed the validity of this criterion by comparing participants with identified moderate and severe mental distress on relevant clinical, impairment, and risk behavior measures. Data were analyzed from 50,880 adult participants in the 2007 California Health Interview Survey. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified K6 ≥ 5 as the optimal lower threshold cut-point indicative of moderate mental distress. Based on the K6, 8.6% of California adults had serious mental distress and another 27.9% had moderate mental distress. Correlates of moderate and serious mental distress were similar. Respondents with moderate mental distress had rates of mental health care utilization, impairment, substance use and other risks lower than respondents with serious mental distress and greater than respondents with none/low mental distress. The findings support expanded use and analysis of the K6 scale in quantifying and examining correlates of mental distress at a moderate, yet still clinically relevant, level.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandMental HealthAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySex Factors

Identifiers

PMID22351472
PMCPMC3370145
OpenAlexW1722711020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.