ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2012
Exploring the implications of INDELs in neuropsychiatric genetics: challenges and perspectives.
Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel Insertion/Deletion Polymorphisms and Genetic Studies of the Shadow of Prion Protein (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Assessment of molecular and morphological dynamics during long-timeFrontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Computational and bioinformatics frameworks for next-generation whole exome and genome sequencing.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The decade passed after publishing the Human Genome first draft faced an enormous growth at the understanding of the genomic variation among different subjects, populations, and groups of patients. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion or deletions (INDELs) have been increasingly recognized as a major type of genetic variations, with potential impact in protein activities and gene expression changes observed in complex genetic traits, like neuropsychiatric diseases. INDELs represent the second most common class of variations after SNPs, but there is still an important gap between the number of INDELs reported and the actual knowledge about the functional implications of such variations. There are approximately 10 million SNPs already reported, and the human populations are expected to collectively harbor at least 1.6-2.5 million INDELs. One of the major challenges is to find better platforms to screen for INDELs in a high throughput manner. The discordance in between the data from different studies might be explained by the diverse approaches employed to sequence the genomes with variable platforms. Short INDEL variations increased the scope of genetic markers in human genetic diseases, and various studies showed that common microdeletions and smaller INDELs might be highly associated with neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, autism, mental retardation, and Alzheimer disease. The rapidly increasing amount of resequencing, genotyping, and personal genome data generated by large-scale genetic human projects require the development of integrated bioinformatics tools able to efficiently manage and analyze these genetic data. Our group is currently dealing with different approaches that might optimize sequencing and bioinformatics analyses of short INDELs to broaden our research capabilities of identifying those intriguing genetic variations. Hopefully, INDELs might become a new trend in association studies in neuropsychiatric genetics since so far the level of significant and positive associations with the standard SNPs reported presents limited predictive application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.