Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350990›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2012

Exploring the implications of INDELs in neuropsychiatric genetics: challenges and perspectives.

R R Lemos, M B R Souza, J R M Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R R LemosKeizo Asami Laboratory (LIKA), Federal University of Pernambuco, 50670901, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
M B R Souza
J R M Oliveira
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The decade passed after publishing the Human Genome first draft faced an enormous growth at the understanding of the genomic variation among different subjects, populations, and groups of patients. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertion or deletions (INDELs) have been increasingly recognized as a major type of genetic variations, with potential impact in protein activities and gene expression changes observed in complex genetic traits, like neuropsychiatric diseases. INDELs represent the second most common class of variations after SNPs, but there is still an important gap between the number of INDELs reported and the actual knowledge about the functional implications of such variations. There are approximately 10 million SNPs already reported, and the human populations are expected to collectively harbor at least 1.6-2.5 million INDELs. One of the major challenges is to find better platforms to screen for INDELs in a high throughput manner. The discordance in between the data from different studies might be explained by the diverse approaches employed to sequence the genomes with variable platforms. Short INDEL variations increased the scope of genetic markers in human genetic diseases, and various studies showed that common microdeletions and smaller INDELs might be highly associated with neuropsychiatric diseases such as schizophrenia, autism, mental retardation, and Alzheimer disease. The rapidly increasing amount of resequencing, genotyping, and personal genome data generated by large-scale genetic human projects require the development of integrated bioinformatics tools able to efficiently manage and analyze these genetic data. Our group is currently dealing with different approaches that might optimize sequencing and bioinformatics analyses of short INDELs to broaden our research capabilities of identifying those intriguing genetic variations. Hopefully, INDELs might become a new trend in association studies in neuropsychiatric genetics since so far the level of significant and positive associations with the standard SNPs reported presents limited predictive application.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenomicsHumansINDEL MutationMood DisordersNervous System DiseasesNeuropsychiatryRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22350990
OpenAlexW1991616544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.