ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2012
Clinical applications of esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry.
Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Guideline on Chronic Nausea and Vomiting-A UEG and ESNM Consensus for Clinical Management.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Guideline
- EAES recommendations for the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Guideline
- Application of High-Resolution Impedance Manometry for Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Obesity Based on the Updated Lyon Consensus 2.0 and Chicago Classification v4.0.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of Surgical Intervention on Nonobstructive Dysphagia: A Retrospective Study Based on High-Resolution Impedance Manometry in a Taiwanese Population at a Single Institution.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of patient position on esophageal motility disorders using high-resolution esophageal manometry with impedance (HREMI): supine versus upright swallows.Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society · 2021Article
- Effect of Bridge Position Swallow on Esophageal Motility in Healthy Individuals Using High-Resolution Manometry.Dysphagia · 2021Article
- Long-Term Manometric Impact of the Adjustable Gastric Band on Esophageal Motility: a Prospective Case-Control Study.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- The effects of different postures and provocative swallow materials on the normative Chicago 3.0 metrics in a healthy Asian population.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021Article
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Empirical vs. Guided Therapy for Non-cardiac Chest Pain: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Ineffective esophageal motility: Concepts, future directions, and conclusions from the Stanford 2018 symposium.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2019Review
- Effects of esophageal acid infusion vs mosapride on distension-induced secondary peristalsis in humans.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Ineffective Esophageal Motility Is Associated with Impaired Bolus Clearance but Does Not Correlate with Severity of Dysphagia.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Improving High-resolution Impedance Manometry Using Novel Viscous and Super-viscous Substrates in the Supine and Upright Positions: A Pilot Study.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2018Article
- New Swallowing Method to Improve Pharyngeal Passage of a Bolus by Creating Negative Pressure in the Esophagus-Vacuum Swallowing.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Review
- Differences in the Control of Secondary Peristalsis in the Human Esophagus: Influence of the 5-HT4 Receptor versus the TRPV1 Receptor.PloS one · 2016Article
- Gastro-esophageal reflux: spitting and possetting in a neonate.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2015Review
- Comparisons of Esophageal Function Tests between Chinese and British Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2015Article
- High-resolution Impedance Manometry Criteria in the Sitting Position Indicative of Incomplete Bolus Clearance.Journal of neurogastroenterology and motility · 2014Article
- Per-oral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: An American perspective.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal impedance monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM) are useful tools in the diagnostic work-up of patients with upper gastrointestinal complaints. Impedance monitoring increases the diagnostic yield for gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults and children and has become the gold standard in the diagnostic work-up of reflux symptoms. Its role in the work-up for belching disorders and rumination seems promising. HRM is superior to other diagnostic tools for the evaluation of achalasia and contributes to a more specific classification of esophageal disorders in patients with non-obstructive dysphagia. The role of HRM in patients with dysphagia after laparoscopic placement of an adjustable gastric band seems promising. Future studies will further determine the clinical implications of the new insights which have been acquired with these techniques. This review aims to describe the clinical applications of impedance monitoring and HRM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.