Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350789›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2012

Family history and risk of breast cancer: nurses' health study.

Graham A Colditz, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Susan E Hankinson, Bernard Rosner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk factors for breast cancer in women: an update review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Targeting WEE1 Kinase for Breast Cancer Therapeutics: An Update.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Biological Activity of Natural and Synthetic Peptides as Anticancer Agents.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Public neoantigens in breast cancer immunotherapy (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Prevalence of Hepatitis B Virus Markers among the Women with Breast Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graham A ColditzDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University of St. Louis, 660 S. Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8100, St. Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA. colditzg@wustl.edu
Kimberly A Kaphingst
Susan E Hankinson
Bernard Rosner
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Statistical MethodsP01CA087969 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TWOROGER, SHELLEY S · 2000 to 2019
$77.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087969NCI NIH HHS P01 CA87969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family history of cancer remains underused in general clinical practice. We assess age at diagnosis and the role of family history in risk of breast cancer. Prospective follow-up of nurses' health study participants from 1980 to 2006. Updated assessment of family history in mother and sister including age at diagnosis. We used youngest age at diagnosis for family member when classifying risk. We confirmed 4327 incident invasive breast cancers confirmed. Breast cancer incidence models fitted to women with and without family history to assess variation in the risk for established risk factors. Compared to women with no family history those whose mother was diagnosed before age 50 had an adjusted relative risk of 1.69 (95% CI 1.39-2.05) and those with mother diagnosed at 50 or older had a relative risk of 1.37 (1.22-1.53). Sister history was associated with increased relative risk; 1.66 (1.38-1.99) for those with sister history before age 50 and 1.52 (1.29-1.77) for those with sister diagnosed at age 50 or older. Women with either mother or sister diagnosed before age 50 had a relative risk of 1.70 (1.48-1.95) significantly higher than those with diagnosis at age 50 or older (RR = 1.30; (1.27-1.54), P = 0.016). The magnitude of risk associated with established reproductive and lifestyle risk factors did not differ significantly between women with and those without family history with the exception of risk after bilateral oophorectomy in which setting women with family history had greater reduction in risk of subsequent breast cancer. Women with a family member diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50 had increased risk of breast cancer compared to women with family members diagnosed at older ages. Consistent findings for risk factors regardless of family history adds to robust evidence for risk identification and risk stratification in clinical settings where prevention strategies will apply equally to women with and without family history.

Indexed as

FamilyNursesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge of OnsetBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID22350789
PMCPMC3387322
OpenAlexW1999332886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.