Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350752›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2012

Cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Klaus Bonaventura, Alexander W Leber, Christian Sohns, Mattias Roser, Leif-Hendrik Boldt, Franz X Kleber, Wilhelm Haverkamp, Marc Dorenkamp

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Local paclitaxel induces late lumen enlargement in coronary arteries after balloon angioplasty.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Treatment of coronary de novo bifurcation lesions with DCB only strategy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Compassionate use of a paclitaxel coated balloon in patients with refractory recurrent coronary in-stent restenosis.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  10. Drug-coated balloons for treatment of coronary artery disease: updated recommendations from a consensus group.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2013
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Cost-effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Germany.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Klaus BonaventuraDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Klinikum Ernst von Bergmann, Potsdam, Germany. kbonaventura@klinikumevb.de
Alexander W Leber
Christian Sohns
Mattias Roser
Leif-Hendrik Boldt
Franz X Kleber
Wilhelm Haverkamp
Marc Dorenkamp
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis (ISR). The cost-effectiveness of this practice is unknown.

methodsA Markov state-transition decision analytic model accounting for varying procedural efficacy rates, complication rates, and cost estimates was developed to compare DCB angioplasty with drug-eluting stent (DES) placement in patients with bare-metal stent (BMS)-ISR. Data on procedural outcomes associated with both treatment strategies were derived from the literature, and the cost analysis was conducted from a health care payer perspective. Effectiveness was expressed as life-years gained.

resultsIn the base-case analysis, initial procedure costs amounted to €3,604.14 for DCB angioplasty and to €3,309.66 for DES implantation. Over a 12-month time horizon, the DCB strategy was found to be less costly (€4,130.38 vs. €5,305.30) and slightly more effective in terms of life expectancy (0.983 vs. 0.976 years) than the DES strategy. Extensive sensitivity analyses indicated that, in comparison with DES implantation, the cost advantage of the DCB strategy was robust to clinically plausible variations in the values of key model input parameters. The variables with the greatest impact on base-case results were the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy with acetylsalicylic acid and clopidogrel after DCB angioplasty, the use of generic clopidogrel, and variations in the costs associated with the DCB device.

conclusionDCB angioplasty is a cost-effective treatment option for coronary BMS-ISR. The higher initial costs of DCB are more than offset by later cost-savings, predominantly as a result of reduced medication costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsStentsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiovascular AgentsCathetersCoated Materials, BiocompatibleComputer SimulationCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisCost-Benefit AnalysisCost SavingsDrug CostsDrug-Eluting StentsEquipment DesignGermanyHumansCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleMetalsPaclitaxelPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22350752
OpenAlexW2062534991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.