Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350716›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2012

Smoking restrictions and hospitalization for acute coronary events in Germany.

James D Sargent, Eugene Demidenko, David J Malenka, Zhongze Li, Helmut Gohlke, Reiner Hanewinkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Trends in dental and oral health status in Germany between 1997 and 2014].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. [Smoke-free Germany 2040: a discussion paper].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

James D SargentDepartment of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Eugene Demidenko
David J Malenka
Zhongze Li
Helmut Gohlke
Reiner Hanewinkel
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USDartmouth Hospital · GBInstitute for Therapy and Health Research · DEUniversitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen · DEUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
Visual Media Influences on Adolescent Smoking Behavior (YR 9 Supplement)R01CA077026 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SARGENT, JAMES D. · 1997 to 2017
$16.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA 77026NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo study the effects of smoking restrictions in Germany on coronary syndromes and their associated costs. METHODS AND

resultsAll German states implemented laws partially restricting smoking in the public and hospitality sectors between August 2007 and July 2008. We conducted a before-and-after study to examine trends for the hospitalization rate for angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for an insurance cohort of 3,700,384 individuals 30 years and older. Outcome measures were hospitalization rates for coronary syndromes, and hospitalization costs. Mean age of the cohort was 56 years, and two-thirds were female. Some 2.2 and 1.1% persons were hospitalized for angina pectoris and AMI, respectively, during the study period from January 2004 through December 2008. Law implementation was associated with a 13.3% (95% confidence interval 8.2, 18.4) decline in angina pectoris and an 8.6% (5.0, 12.2) decline in AMI after 1 year. Hospitalization costs also decreased significantly for the two conditions-9.6% (2.5, 16.6) for angina pectoris and 20.1% (16.0, 24.2) for AMI at 1 year following law implementation. Assuming the law caused the observed declines, it prevented 1,880 hospitalizations and saved 7.7 million Euros in costs for this cohort during the year following law implementation.

conclusionsPartial smoking restrictions in Germany were followed by reductions in hospitalization for angina pectoris and AMI, declines that continued through 1 year following these laws and resulted in substantial cost savings. Strengthening the laws could further reduce morbidity and costs from acute coronary syndromes in Germany.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisCohort StudiesCost SavingsFemaleGermanyHospital CostsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionOutcome Assessment, Health CarePublic Policy

Identifiers

PMID22350716
PMCPMC3719165
OpenAlexW2114373243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.