Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350239›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2012

Validation of a new box trainer-related tracking device: the TrEndo.

Pieter J van Empel, Lennart B van Rijssen, Joris P Commandeur, Mathilde G E Verdam, Judith A Huirne, Fedde Scheele, H Jaap Bonjer, W Jeroen Meijerink

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Development of a synchronous motion-tracking and video capture tool for flexible ureteroscopy.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pieter J van EmpelDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.vanempel@vumc.nl
Lennart B van Rijssen
Joris P Commandeur
Mathilde G E Verdam
Judith A Huirne
Fedde Scheele
H Jaap Bonjer
W Jeroen Meijerink

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an increasing demand for structured objective ex vivo training and assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills prior to implementation of these skills in practice. The aim of this study was to establish the internal validity of the TrEndo, a motion-tracking device, for implementation on a laparoscopic box trainer.

methodsFace validity and content validity were addressed through a structured questionnaire. To assess construct validity, participants were divided into an expert group and a novice group and performed two basic laparoscopic tasks. The TrEndo recorded five motion analysis parameters (MAPs) and time.

resultsParticipants demonstrated a high regard for face and content validity. All recorded MAPs differed significantly between experts and novices after performing a square knot. Overall, the TrEndo correctly assigned group membership in 84.7 and 95.7% of cases based on two laparoscopic tasks.

conclusionFace, content, and construct validities of the TrEndo were established. The TrEndo holds real potential as a (home) training device.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceTeaching MaterialsClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, ContinuingEquipment DesignFemaleGeneral SurgeryGynecologyHumansLaparoscopyMaleModels, AnatomicMovementProspective StudiesUrology

Identifiers

PMID22350239
PMCPMC3392508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.