Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350060›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2012

Vascularized retinal pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration: treatment and RPE tear incidence.

Ugo Introini, Ana Torres Gimeno, Fabrizio Scotti, Marco Setaccioli, Silvia Giatsidis, Francesco Bandello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ugo IntroiniDepartment of Ophthalmology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. introini.ugo@hsr.it
Ana Torres Gimeno
Fabrizio Scotti
Marco Setaccioli
Silvia Giatsidis
Francesco Bandello
San Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo review vascularized-pigment epithelial detachment (V-PED) treatment visual outcome, and to assess acute retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear incidence.

methodsOne hundred and thirty-two eyes of 125 consecutive patients with age-related macular degeneration and V-PED were included. Ninety-four eyes (71.2%) were associated with choroidal new vessels (CNV), 38 (28.8%) with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). Patients, treated over a 10-year period with the time-current therapy, received: verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) (group 1, 38 eyes), combined intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and PDT (group 2, 44 eyes) or intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) (group 3, 50 eyes).

resultsMean follow-up was 20.5 months. At month 12, all eyes treated with PDT or with IVTA and PDT showed a mean significant severe visual decrease. Eyes with CNV lost -0.67 and -0.37 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01 respectively), and eyes with RAP -0.55 and -0.31 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01 respectively). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%) and in six eyes (13.6%) in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy showed slight mean visual acuity decrease at month 12. Those with CNV had a mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.36 ± 0.24 logMAR, final of 0.44 ± 0.30 logMAR (-0.08 logMAR, n.s.). In eyes with RAP, mean baseline BCVA was 0.58 ± 0.39 logMAR, final was 0.78 ± 0.47 logMAR (-0.20 logMAR, n.s.). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%). Patients with either V-PED with CNV or a better baseline BCVA showed greater risk of acute RPE tear (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively).

conclusionsEffective treatment for vascularized PED is still lacking. Until now, only stabilization of the disease has been achieved using anti-VEGF therapy, but the risk of RPE tear can further hamper our expectations. Baseline characteristics are helpful for prognosis, but patients must be informed of the uncertain response. New therapeutic strategies are needed.

Indexed as

PhotochemotherapyRetinal Pigment EpitheliumAgedAged, 80 and overAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabChoroidal NeovascularizationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFluorescein AngiographyGlucocorticoidsHumansIndocyanine GreenIntravitreal InjectionsMacular DegenerationAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabGlucocorticoidsIndocyanine GreenPhotosensitizing AgentsPorphyrinsRanibizumabTriamcinolone AcetonideVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, humanVerteporfin

Identifiers

PMID22350060
OpenAlexW2035718669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.