Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22350023›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2013

Prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Hiroshi Okumura, Yasuto Uchikado, Masataka Matsumoto, Tetsuhiro Owaki, Yoshiaki Kita, Itaru Omoto, Ken Sasaki, Toshihide Sakurai, Tetsuro Setoyama, Bunpei Nabeki and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. SUVWorld journal of surgical oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Clinical features and treatment of patients with esophageal cancer and a history of gastrectomy: a multicenter, questionnaire survey in Kyushu, Japan.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hiroshi OkumuraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kagoshima University, Sakuragaoka 8-35-1, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan. hokumura@m.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp
Yasuto Uchikado
Masataka Matsumoto
Tetsuhiro Owaki
Yoshiaki Kita
Itaru Omoto
Ken Sasaki
Toshihide Sakurai
Tetsuro Setoyama
Bunpei Nabeki
Daisuke Matsushita
Sumiya Ishigami
Yoshiyuki Hiraki
Masayuki Nakajo
Shoji Natsugoe
Kagoshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive evaluation of surgical specimens obtained after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is important for assessing additional treatment or prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). In this study, we examined the histological prognostic factors for ESCC patients treated with CRT and determined an appropriate strategy for their evaluation. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe present study involved 38 consecutive ESCC patients who underwent CRT followed by curative operation. CRT consisted of 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin and 40 Gy of radiation. We examined histological variables as follows: CRT effect on primary tumor (T-effect: T-effective/T-ineffective), tumor depth (pT), lymph node metastases (pN: pN0/N1), number of lymph node metastases (number-pN), lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the independent prognostic factors. Survivals and mode of recurrence were then evaluated according to the independent prognostic factors.

resultsIn the univariate analyses, T-effect, pN, number-pN, lymphatic invasion, and venous invasion were found to be prognostic factors with p < 0.01, and pT was a factor with p < 0.05. In the multivariate analysis, pN and T-effect were independent prognostic factors. The five-year survival rate of pN0 patients was more than 75%, even though the T-effect was poor. The 5-year survival rate of patients judged as pN1/T-effective was 50%, whereas all of the pN1/T-ineffective patients died within 2 years with relapse disease.

conclusionThe evaluation method using both pN status and T-effect is useful for assessing prognosis of ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellChemoradiotherapyCisplatinCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyCisplatinFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID22350023
OpenAlexW2006056589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.