ArticleJournal of anesthesia2012
Calcium channel blockers are inadequate for malignant hyperthermia crisis.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- JSA guideline for management of malignant hyperthermia in 2025.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Guideline
- JSA guideline for the management of malignant hyperthermia crisis 2016.Journal of anesthesia · 2017Guideline
- Functional analysis of newly identified RYR1 variants in patients susceptible to malignant hyperthermia.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Article
- Anesthetic Management of the Hypertensive Patient: Part II.Anesthesia progress · 2018Review
- [Malignant hyperthermia].Der Anaesthesist · 2014Review
- Calcium channel blockers are inadequate for malignant hyperthermia crisis.Journal of anesthesia · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMalignant hyperthermia (MH) results from disordered calcium (Ca(2+)) homeostasis in skeletal muscle during general anesthesia. Although Ca(2+) channel blockers may be given to treat the tachycardia and circulatory instability, coadministration of Ca(2+) channel blockers and dantrolene is contraindicated during MH crisis. We evaluated the effect of Ca(2+) channel blockers on Ca(2+) homeostasis and their interactions with dantrolene in human skeletal muscle.
methodsHuman skeletal muscle samples were obtained by biopsy and divided into two groups according to the results of the Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release rate test. Differentiated myotubes were labeled with Fura-2, and changes in the 340/380-nm ratio were used to calculate changes in Ca(2+) concentration following nifedipine treatment in the absence or presence of dantrolene.
resultsNifedipine induced a transient increase in the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in a dose-dependent manner. The half-maximal concentration (EC(50)) for nifedipine was 0.718 ± 0.329 μM in the accelerated group and 1.389 ± 0.482 μM in the nonaccelerated group (P = 0.009). The addition of 50 μM dantrolene attenuated by 15.4% the increase in [Ca(2+)](i) caused by the 0.5 μM nifedipine.
conclusionCa(2+) channel blockers led to increased [Ca(2+)](i) in human skeletal muscle cells. The increase is thus scarcely affected by dantrolene treatment. Data provide a greater physiologic basis for avoiding the use of Ca(2+) channel blockers during MH crisis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.