Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22349622›Full record

ReviewJournal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology2012

Spinal manipulative therapy and somatosensory activation.

J G Pickar, P S Bolton

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02407418 nacompletednot on this map

The Effects of Lumbosacral Manipulation on Isokinetic Strength of the Knee Extensors and Flexors

TypeinterventionalSponsorGrant SandersRan2012 to 2012Enrolled21ConditionsSubluxation of Joint of Lumbar SpineArmsSpinal Manipulation, Sham Manipulation
NCT04347551 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Motor Performance of Asymptomatic and Chronic Neck Pain Participants Pre- and Post-spinal Manipulation Using an Eye and Head Movement Fitts' Task

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsChronic Neck PainArmsHigh velocity/low amplitude cervical spine manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J G PickarPalmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, IA, USA. pickar_j@palmer.edu
P S Bolton
Hunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

Mechanisms and Effects of Chiropractic ManipulationU19AT002006 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI MEEKER, WILLIAM C · 2003 to 2006
$2.3M
RENOVATION OF PALMER CENTER FOR CHIROPRACTIC RESEARCHC06RR015433 · NCRR · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI MEEKER, WILLIAM C · 2000 to 2000
$1.3M
Does spinal manipulation speed determine neural responseR21AT000676 · NCCIH · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI PICKAR, JOEL G · 2001 to 2002
$284k
NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF LUMBAR FACET MOVEMENTR01NS035300 · NINDS · PALMER COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC · PI PICKAR, JOEL G · 1997 to 2001
$27k
NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT000676NCCIH NIH HHS U19 AT002006NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015433NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR15433NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manually-applied movement and mobilization of body parts as a healing activity has been used for centuries. A relatively high velocity, low amplitude force applied to the vertebral column with therapeutic intent, referred to as spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), is one such activity. It is most commonly used by chiropractors, but other healthcare practitioners including osteopaths and physiotherapists also perform SMT. The mechanisms responsible for the therapeutic effects of SMT remain unclear. Early theories proposed that the nervous system mediates the effects of SMT. The goal of this article is to briefly update our knowledge regarding several physical characteristics of an applied SMT, and review what is known about the signaling characteristics of sensory neurons innervating the vertebral column in response to spinal manipulation. Based upon the experimental literature, we propose that SMT may produce a sustained change in the synaptic efficacy of central neurons by evoking a high frequency, bursting discharge from several types of dynamically-sensitive, mechanosensitive paraspinal primary afferent neurons.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSensory Receptor CellsHumansManipulation, SpinalSomatosensory CortexSpinal CordSpine

Identifiers

PMID22349622
PMCPMC3399029
OpenAlexW2101175527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.