Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22349480›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2012

[Triage systems in the emergency department].

P Weyrich, M Christ, N Celebi, R Riessen

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Copenhagen Triage Algorithm: a randomized controlled trial.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2016
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Acute Onset of Impaired Consciousness.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Emergency Medicine : What do we need?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. [Bacterial meningitis in adults in emergency and rescue services].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Article
  15. [Position paper for a reform of medical emergency care in German emergency departments].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P WeyrichZentralbereich Notaufnahme, Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Straße 10, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland. peter.weyrich@med.uni-tuebingen.de
M Christ
N Celebi
R Riessen
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen · DENuremberg Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) triage systems facilitate the categorization of emergency patients according to their disease severity and determine both treatment priority and treatment location. Four different five-level triage systems are internationally accepted. The Australasian Triage Scale (ATS, Australasia) allows categorization based on symptoms using specific descriptors. The Manchester Triage System (MTS, UK) uses defined presentational flow charts combined with indicators. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS, Canada) is based on the ATS, but also includes diagnoses. The Emergency Severity Index (ESI, USA) first excludes life-threatening and severe disease before stratification according to estimated resource utilization. The goal of all triage systems is to reduce the in-hospital mortality and to minimize time to treatment, length of stay, and resource utilization.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalCross-Cultural ComparisonGermanyHealth ResourcesHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsNational Health ProgramsPatient AdmissionPrognosisQuality Assurance, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsTriageUtilization ReviewWaiting Lists

Identifiers

PMID22349480
OpenAlexW1530902200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.