Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22349419›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2012

Recommendations for sepsis management in resource-limited settings.

Martin W Dünser, Emir Festic, Arjen Dondorp, Niranjan Kissoon, Tsenddorj Ganbat, Arthur Kwizera, Rashan Haniffa, Tim Baker, Marcus J Schultz, Global Intensive Care Working Group of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 81 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.

Martin W DünserDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and General Critical Care Medicine, Salzburg General Hospital and Paracelsus Private Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. M.Duenser@salk.at
Emir Festic
Arjen Dondorp
Niranjan Kissoon
Tsenddorj Ganbat
Arthur Kwizera
Rashan Haniffa
Tim Baker
Marcus J Schultz
Global Intensive Care Working Group of European Society of Intensive Care Medicine
Central State University · USChild and Family Research Institute · CAKarolinska University Hospital · SEMahidol University · THMulago Hospital · UGParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Amsterdam · NLWinnMed · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust 089275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide clinicians practicing in resource-limited settings with a framework to improve the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric and adult patients with sepsis.

methodsThe medical literature on sepsis management was reviewed. Specific attention was paid to identify clinical evidence on sepsis management from resource-limited settings.

resultsRecommendations are grouped into acute and post-acute interventions. Acute interventions include liberal fluid resuscitation to achieve adequate tissue perfusion, normal heart rate and arterial blood pressure, use of epinephrine or dopamine for inadequate tissue perfusion despite fluid resuscitation, frequent measurement of arterial blood pressure in hemodynamically unstable patients, administration of hydrocortisone or prednisolone to patients requiring catecholamines, oxygen administration to achieve an oxygen saturation >90%, semi-recumbent and/or lateral position, non-invasive ventilation for increased work of breathing or hypoxemia despite oxygen therapy, timely administration of adequate antimicrobials, thorough clinical investigation for infectious source identification, fluid/tissue sampling and microbiological work-up, removal, drainage or debridement of the infectious source. Post-acute interventions include regular re-assessment of antimicrobial therapy, administration of antimicrobials for an adequate but not prolonged duration, avoidance of hypoglycemia, pharmacological or mechanical deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, resumption of oral food intake after resuscitation and regaining of consciousness, careful use of opioids and sedatives, early mobilization, and active weaning of invasive support. Specific considerations for malaria, puerperal sepsis and HIV/AIDS patients with sepsis are included.

conclusionOnly scarce evidence exists for the management of pediatric and adult sepsis in resource-limited settings. The presented recommendations may help to improve sepsis management in middle- and low-income countries.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth ResourcesCritical CareHumansSepsis

Identifiers

PMID22349419
PMCPMC3307996
OpenAlexW2093598389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.