ReviewIntensive care medicine2012
Recommendations for sepsis management in resource-limited settings.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 81 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of vasopressor choice on renal outcomes in septic shock: a systematic review of randomised trials as a guide for future research.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Quality of guidelines for infection management in sepsis: a critical appraisal using the AGREE II instrument.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Pooled it
- Recommendations for fluid management of adults with sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of guidelines.Critical care (London, England) · 2020Pooled it
- The Early Recognition and Management of Sepsis in Sub-Saharan African Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Pooled it
- Exploring mechanisms of excess mortality with early fluid resuscitation: insights from the FEAST trial.BMC medicine · 2013Trial
- Supportive care and in-hospital mortality among children with suspected sepsis in Bamako, Mali.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Biosensors for Sepsis Diagnosis: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives (2020-2025).Biosensors · 2025Review
- Haemodynamic management of septic shock.Burns & trauma · 2025Review
- Article
- A narrative review of the pathophysiology of sepsis in sub-Saharan Africa: Exploring the potential for corticosteroid therapy.PLOS global public health · 2025Review
- Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- The Global Burden of Sepsis and Septic Shock.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Modelling climate impacts on paediatric sepsis incidence and severity in Bangladesh.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Article
- Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the Italian council for the optimization of antimicrobial use.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Review
- Inflammaging in Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis of Geriatric ICU Patients and Healthcare Challenges.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Preventative Management of Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Geriatric Population.Cureus · 2023Review
- The West Africa Lassa fever Consortium pre-positioned protocol for a Phase II/III adaptive, randomised, controlled, platform trial to evaluate multiple Lassa fever therapeutics.Wellcome open research · 2023Article
- Impact of integrated community-facility interventions model on neonatal mortality in rural Bangladesh- a quasi-experimental study.PloS one · 2023Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 9 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo provide clinicians practicing in resource-limited settings with a framework to improve the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric and adult patients with sepsis.
methodsThe medical literature on sepsis management was reviewed. Specific attention was paid to identify clinical evidence on sepsis management from resource-limited settings.
resultsRecommendations are grouped into acute and post-acute interventions. Acute interventions include liberal fluid resuscitation to achieve adequate tissue perfusion, normal heart rate and arterial blood pressure, use of epinephrine or dopamine for inadequate tissue perfusion despite fluid resuscitation, frequent measurement of arterial blood pressure in hemodynamically unstable patients, administration of hydrocortisone or prednisolone to patients requiring catecholamines, oxygen administration to achieve an oxygen saturation >90%, semi-recumbent and/or lateral position, non-invasive ventilation for increased work of breathing or hypoxemia despite oxygen therapy, timely administration of adequate antimicrobials, thorough clinical investigation for infectious source identification, fluid/tissue sampling and microbiological work-up, removal, drainage or debridement of the infectious source. Post-acute interventions include regular re-assessment of antimicrobial therapy, administration of antimicrobials for an adequate but not prolonged duration, avoidance of hypoglycemia, pharmacological or mechanical deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, resumption of oral food intake after resuscitation and regaining of consciousness, careful use of opioids and sedatives, early mobilization, and active weaning of invasive support. Specific considerations for malaria, puerperal sepsis and HIV/AIDS patients with sepsis are included.
conclusionOnly scarce evidence exists for the management of pediatric and adult sepsis in resource-limited settings. The presented recommendations may help to improve sepsis management in middle- and low-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.