Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22348907›Full record

ArticleBeneficial microbes2012

Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus reuteri modulate cytokine responses in gnotobiotic pigs infected with human rotavirus.

M S P Azevedo, W Zhang, K Wen, A M Gonzalez, L J Saif, A E Yousef, L Yuan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beneficial microbes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Effects of Heat-KilledVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. The role of potential probiotic strainsFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Study and use of the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in pigs: a review.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M S P AzevedoUS Food and Drug Administration, National Center for Toxicological Research, Division of Microbiology, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA.
W Zhang
K Wen
A M Gonzalez
L J Saif
A E Yousef
L Yuan
The Ohio State University · USVirginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

ENHANCING THE IMMUNOGENICITY OF HUMAN ROTAVIRUS VACCINESR01AI033561 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SAIF, LINDA J. · 1992 to 2006
$945k
Effects of Probiotic Lactobacilli on Rotavirus ImmunityR21AT002524 · NCCIH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI YUAN, LIJUAN · 2005 to 2006
$354k
NCCIH NIH HHS 1R21AT002524NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT002524NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI033561NIAID NIH HHS R01AI033561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been shown to alleviate inflammation, enhance the immunogenicity of rotavirus vaccines, or reduce the severity of rotavirus diarrhoea. Although the mechanisms are not clear, the differential Th1/Th2/Th3-driving capacities and modulating effects on cytokine production of different LAB strains may be the key. Our goal was to delineate the influence of combining two probiotic strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus reuteri on the development of cytokine responses in neonatal gnotobiotic pigs infected with human rotavirus (HRV). We demonstrated that HRV alone, or HRV plus LAB, but not LAB alone, initiated serum cytokine responses, as indicated by significantly higher concentrations of IFN-α, IFN-γ, IL-12, and IL-10 at postinoculation day (PID) 2 in the HRV only and LAB+HRV+ pigs compared to LAB only and LAB-HRV- pigs. Peak cytokine responses coincided with the peak of HRV replication. LAB further enhanced the Th1 and Th2 cytokine responses to HRV infection as indicated by significantly higher concentrations of IL-12, IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-10 in the LAB+HRV+ pigs compared to the LAB-HRV+ pigs. The LAB+HRV+ pigs maintained relatively constant concentrations of TGF-β compared to the HRV only group which had a significant increase at PID 2 and decrease at PID 7, suggesting a regulatory role of LAB in maintaining gut homeostasis. At PID 28, cytokine secreting cell (CSC) responses, measured by ELISpot, showed increased Th1 (IL-12, IFN-γ) CSC numbers in the LAB+HRV+ and LAB-HRV+ groups compared to LAB only and LAB-HRV- pigs, with significantly increased IL-12 CSCs in spleen and PBMCs and IFN-γ CSCs in spleen of the LAB+HRV+ group. Thus, HRV infection alone, but not LAB alone was effective in inducing cytokine responses but LAB significantly enhanced both Th1 and Th2 cytokines in HRV-infected pigs. LAB may also help to maintain immunological homeostasis during HRV infection by regulating TGF-β production.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesDiarrheaEnzyme-Linked Immunospot AssayGerm-Free LifeIntestinesLactobacillus acidophilusLimosilactobacillus reuteriProbioticsRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsSpleenSwineTh1 CellsTh2 CellsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID22348907
PMCPMC3304463
OpenAlexW2012935616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.