Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22348010›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Weak prezygotic isolating mechanisms in threatened Caribbean Acropora corals.

Nicole D Fogarty, Steven V Vollmer, Don R Levitan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. OptimizingPeerJ · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. First evidence for backcrossing of FScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Moonrise timing is key for synchronized spawning in coralProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Considerations for maximizing the adaptive potential of restored coral populations in the western Atlantic.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2019
    Article
  16. Clonal diversity impacts coral cover inEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic patterns inEcology and evolution · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole D FogartyDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America. fogartyn@si.edu
Steven V Vollmer
Don R Levitan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Caribbean corals, Acropora palmata and A. cervicornis, recently have undergone drastic declines primarily as a result of disease. Previous molecular studies have demonstrated that these species form a hybrid (A. prolifera) that varies in abundance throughout the range of the parental distribution. There is variable unidirectional introgression across loci and sites of A. palmata genes flowing into A. cervicornis. Here we examine the efficacy of prezygotic reproductive isolating mechanisms within these corals including spawning times and choice and no-choice fertilization crosses. We show that these species have subtly different mean but overlapping spawning times, suggesting that temporal isolation is likely not an effective barrier to hybridization. We found species-specific differences in gametic incompatibilities. Acropora palmata eggs were relatively resistant to hybridization, especially when conspecific sperm are available to outcompete heterospecific sperm. Acropora cervicornis eggs demonstrated no evidence for gametic incompatibility and no evidence of reduced viability after aging four hours. This asymmetry in compatibility matches previous genetic data on unidirectional introgression.

Indexed as

AnthozoaEndangered SpeciesReproductionAnimalsCaribbean RegionPopulation DynamicsSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID22348010
PMCPMC3279358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.