Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22348006›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Shiga toxin binding to glycolipids and glycans.

Karen M Gallegos, Deborah G Conrady, Sayali S Karve, Thusitha S Gunasekera, Andrew B Herr, Alison A Weiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cholera toxin as a model ABArchives of toxicology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Cellular signaling pathway of Shiga toxin-induced ATP release.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The diverse landscape of AB5-type toxins.Engineering microbiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Recent Advancements in Technologies to Detect EnterohaemorrhagicJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen M GallegosDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Deborah G Conrady
Sayali S Karve
Thusitha S Gunasekera
Andrew B Herr
Alison A Weiss
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

Glycoconjugate based diagnostics for bacterial toxinsU01AI075498 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WEISS, ALISON A. · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
Shiga Toxin Production and Role in PathogenesisR01AI064893 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI WEISS, ALISON A. · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI 064893NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064893NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI 075498NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075498
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmunologically distinct forms of Shiga toxin (Stx1 and Stx2) display different potencies and disease outcomes, likely due to differences in host cell binding. The glycolipid globotriaosylceramide (Gb3) has been reported to be the receptor for both toxins. While there is considerable data to suggest that Gb3 can bind Stx1, binding of Stx2 to Gb3 is variable. METHODOLOGY: We used isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to examine binding of Stx1 and Stx2 to various glycans, glycosphingolipids, and glycosphingolipid mixtures in the presence or absence of membrane components, phosphatidylcholine, and cholesterol. We have also assessed the ability of glycolipids mixtures to neutralize Stx-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis in Vero kidney cells.

resultsBy ITC, Stx1 bound both Pk (the trisaccharide on Gb3) and P (the tetrasaccharide on globotetraosylceramide, Gb4), while Stx2 did not bind to either glycan. Binding to neutral glycolipids individually and in combination was assessed by ELISA. Stx1 bound to glycolipids Gb3 and Gb4, and Gb3 mixed with other neural glycolipids, while Stx2 only bound to Gb3 mixtures. In the presence of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol, both Stx1 and Stx2 bound well to Gb3 or Gb4 alone or mixed with other neutral glycolipids. Pre-incubation with Gb3 in the presence of phosphatidylcholine and cholesterol neutralized Stx1, but not Stx2 toxicity to Vero cells.

conclusionsStx1 binds primarily to the glycan, but Stx2 binding is influenced by residues in the ceramide portion of Gb3 and the lipid environment. Nanomolar affinities were obtained for both toxins to immobilized glycolipids mixtures, while the effective dose for 50% inhibition (ED(50)) of protein synthesis was about 10(-11) M. The failure of preincubation with Gb3 to protect cells from Stx2 suggests that in addition to glycolipid expression, other cellular components contribute to toxin potency.

Indexed as

GlycolipidsPolysaccharidesProtein BindingShiga ToxinShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2GlycolipidsPolysaccharidesShiga ToxinShiga Toxin 1Shiga Toxin 2

Identifiers

PMID22348006
PMCPMC3278406
OpenAlexW2069894761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.