ArticlePloS one2012
Health risk or resource? Gradual and independent association between self-rated health and mortality persists over 30 years.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Changes in socioeconomic inequality in self-assessed health in South Africa: The contributions of changes in inequalities between and within socioeconomic groups.SSM - population health · 2025Article
- Quantifying the relationship between gardening and health and well-being in the UK: a survey during the covid-19 pandemic.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Mortality in Women across theCells · 2023Article
- Self-Rated Health and Mortality: Moderation by Purpose in Life.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Domain-specific physical activity, sedentary behavior, subjective health, and health-related quality of life among older adults.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Who live longer than their age peers: individual predictors of longevity among older individuals.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Multidimensional Assessment of Subjective Well-Being and Risk of Dementia: Findings from the UK Biobank Study.Journal of happiness studies · 2023Article
- Assessment of self-rated health: The relative importance of physiological, mental, and socioeconomic factors.PloS one · 2022Article
- Measuring population health: association of self-rated health and PROMIS measures with social determinants of health in a cross-sectional survey of the US population.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2021Article
- Article
- Experience of violence and self-rated health: Do youths disclose their experiences when visiting a Youth Centre in Sweden.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2021Article
- The association between subjective health perception and lifestyle factors in Shiga prefecture, Japan: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2020Article
- The Association of Grip Strength with Depressive Symptoms among Middle-Aged and Older Adults with Different Chronic Diseases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Do response styles affect the predictive validity of self-rated health among Chinese older men and women?Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Correlates of Commuter Cycling in Three Norwegian Counties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Intake of Processed Meat and Association with Sociodemographic and Lifestyle Factors in a Representative Sample of the Swiss Population.Nutrients · 2019Article
- Smokeless tobacco mortality risks: an analysis of two contemporary nationally representative longitudinal mortality studies.Harm reduction journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor self-rated health (SRH) is associated with increased mortality. However, most studies only adjust for few health risk factors and/or do not analyse whether this association is consistent also for intermediate categories of SRH and for follow-up periods exceeding 5-10 years. This study examined whether the SRH-mortality association remained significant 30 years after assessment when adjusting for a wide range of known clinical, behavioural and socio-demographic risk factors.
methodsWe followed-up 8,251 men and women aged ≥ 16 years who participated 1977-79 in a community based health study and were anonymously linked with the Swiss National Cohort (SNC) until the end of 2008. Covariates were measured at baseline and included education, marital status, smoking, medical history, medication, blood glucose and pressure.
results92.8% of the original study participants could be linked to a census, mortality or emigration record of the SNC. Loss to follow-up 1980-2000 was 5.8%. Even after 30 years of follow-up and after adjustment for all covariates, the association between SRH and all-cause mortality remained strong and estimates almost linearly increased from "excellent" (reference: hazard ratio, HR 1) to "good" (men: HR 1.07 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.24, women: 1.22, 1.01-1.46) to "fair" (1.41, 1.18-1.68; 1.39, 1.14-1.70) to "poor"(1.61, 1.15-2.25; 1.49, 1.07-2.06) to "very poor" (2.85, 1.25-6.51; 1.30, 0.18-9.35). Persons answering the SRH question with "don't know" (1.87, 1.21-2.88; 1.26, 0.87-1.83) had also an increased mortality risk; this was pronounced in men and in the first years of follow-up.
conclusionsSRH is a strong and "dose-dependent" predictor of mortality. The association was largely independent from covariates and remained significant after decades. This suggests that SRH provides relevant and sustained health information beyond classical risk factors or medical history and reflects salutogenetic rather than pathogenetic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.