Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22346762›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Contrasting properties of gene-specific regulatory, coding, and copy number mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: frequency, effects, and dominance.

Jonathan D Gruber, Kara Vogel, Gizem Kalay, Patricia J Wittkopp

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Contributions of mutation and selection to regulatory variation: lessons from thePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of regulatory evolution in yeast.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan D GruberDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kara Vogel
Gizem Kalay
Patricia J Wittkopp
Michigan United · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Investigating compensatory mechanisms for gene expression in the yeast genomeF32GM083513 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GRUBER, JONATHAN DAVID · 2008 to 2010
$143k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1F32GM083513-0NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation within and between species can be shaped by population-level processes and mutation; however, the relative impact of "survival of the fittest" and "arrival of the fittest" on phenotypic evolution remains unclear. Assessing the influence of mutation on evolution requires understanding the relative rates of different types of mutations and their genetic properties, yet little is known about the functional consequences of new mutations. Here, we examine the spectrum of mutations affecting a focal gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by characterizing 231 novel haploid genotypes with altered activity of a fluorescent reporter gene. 7% of these genotypes had a nonsynonymous mutation in the coding sequence for the fluorescent protein and were classified as "coding" mutants; 2% had a change in the S. cerevisiae TDH3 promoter sequence controlling expression of the fluorescent protein and were classified as "cis-regulatory" mutants; 10% contained two copies of the reporter gene and were classified as "copy number" mutants; and the remaining 81% showed altered fluorescence without a change in the reporter gene itself and were classified as "trans-acting" mutants. As a group, coding mutants had the strongest effect on reporter gene activity and always decreased it. By contrast, 50%-95% of the mutants in each of the other three classes increased gene activity, with mutants affecting copy number and cis-regulatory sequences having larger median effects on gene activity than trans-acting mutants. When made heterozygous in diploid cells, coding, cis-regulatory, and copy number mutant genotypes all had significant effects on gene activity, whereas 88% of the trans-acting mutants appeared to be recessive. These differences in the frequency, effects, and dominance among functional classes of mutations might help explain why some types of mutations are found to be segregating within or fixed between species more often than others.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsEvolution, MolecularGenes, DominantGenes, RecessiveGenotypeGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)HaploidyHeterozygoteMutationMutation RateOpen Reading FramesPromoter Regions, GeneticRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsGlyceraldehyde-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (Phosphorylating)Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTDH3 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22346762
PMCPMC3276545
OpenAlexW1986497280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.