ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2009
Electroanalytical sensors and devices for multiplexed detection of foodborne pathogen microorganisms.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Hyperspectral Imaging as a Nondestructive Technique for Foodborne Pathogen Detection and Characterization.Foodborne pathogens and disease · 2019Review
- Carbon Quantum Dot-Modified Carbon Paste Electrode-Based Sensor for Selective and Sensitive Determination of Adrenaline.ACS omega · 2019Article
- Multiplexed Paper Microfluidics for Titration and Detection of Ingredients in Beverages.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Detection of Foodborne Pathogens by Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
- Molecular Techniques for the Detection of Organisms in Aquatic Environments, with Emphasis on Harmful Algal Bloom Species.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Point-of-care (POC) devices by means of advanced MEMS.Talanta · 2015Review
- Past, Present and Future of Sensors in Food Production.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2014Review
- Bacterial detection & identification using electrochemical sensors.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2013Article
- Advances in electronic-nose technologies developed for biomedical applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2011Review
- Peptide-nanotube biochips for label-free detection of multiple pathogens.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2010Article
- DNA diagnostics: nanotechnology-enhanced electrochemical detection of nucleic acids.Pediatric research · 2010Review
- Pathogen sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection and identification of pathogen microorganisms still rely on conventional culturing techniques, which are not suitable for on-site monitoring. Therefore, a great research challenge in this field is focused on the need to develop rapid, reliable, specific, and sensitive methods to detect these bacteria at low cost. Moreover, the growing interest in biochip development for large scale screening analysis implies improved miniaturization, reduction of analysis time and cost, and multi-analyte detection, which has nowadays become a crucial challenge. This paper reviews multiplexed foodborne pathogen microorganisms detection methods based on electrochemical sensors incorporating microarrays and other platforms. These devices usually involve antibody-antigen and DNA hybridization specific interactions, although other approaches such as the monitoring of oxygen consumption are also considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.