Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22346534›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses1998

Cross-Canada survey of resistance of 2747 aerobic blood culture isolates to piperacillin/tazobactam and other antibiotics.

K R Forward, P A Franks, D E Low, R Rennie, A E Simor, Canadian Piperacillin/Tazobactam Study Group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of infectious diseases = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses, 1998. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

K R ForwardDivision of Microbiology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia; Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hôpital Maisoneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec; Microbiology and Public Health, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta; Wyeth-Ayerst Canada Inc; Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai & Princess Margaret Hospitals; Department of Microbiology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario.
P A Franks
D E Low
R Rennie
A E Simor
Canadian Piperacillin/Tazobactam Study Group
Alberta Hospital Edmonton · CAHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the activity of piperacillin/tazobactam with that of other broad parenteral antibiotics against aerobic and facultative anaerobic blood culture isolates in a Canada-wide survey.

designFifty-eight laboratories in nine provinces each contributed up to 50 consecutive clinically significant aerobic and facultative anaerobic isolates for susceptibility testing.

settingParticipating hospitals included both tertiary care and community hospitals. MATERIALS AND

methodsTesting was performed in five regional centres by using the same microbroth dilution method, and results were interpreted according to National Commitee for Clinical Laboratory Standards M7-A3 and M100-S5 guidelines.

resultsPiperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem were both active against more than 99% of the 1616 strains of Enterobacteriaceae species tested. The minimum inhibitory concentration of 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) of all Enterobacteriaceae species was 2 mg/L for piperacillin/tazobactam compared with 64 mg/L for piperacillin alone. Seventeen per cent of strains of Enterobacteriaceae species were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam but resistant to piperacillin. Piperacillin/tazobactam was highly active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, inhibiting 99.1% of strains. MIC(90) was 8 mg/L. Nine per cent of P aeruginosa strains were not susceptible to imipenem. Most of these strains had a MIC of 8 mg/L, which falls in the intermediate category. Ninety-seven per cent of P aeruginosa were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and 97.3% to tobramycin. Ninety-six per cent of strains of Actinobacter species were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam, whereas only 76% of strains were susceptible to piperacillin alone. Overall, piperacillin/tazobactam was the most active agent tested; 98% of all strains were susceptible, followed closely by imipenem, to which 97.8% of strains were susceptible.

conclusionsAerobic blood culture isolates from Canadian centres continue to be highly susceptible to a variety of antibiotics. The broad spectrum of activity of piperacillin/tazobactam suggests that this combination should be considered for empirical treatment of sepsis while awaiting results of cultures and susceptibility testing.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistancePiperacillinSusceptibility surveryTazobactam

Identifiers

PMID22346534
PMCPMC3250870
OpenAlexW2312906557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.