ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2012
Evolutionary Genomics of Genes Involved in Olfactory Behavior in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group.
Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Identification and motif analyses of candidate nonreceptor olfactory genes of Dendroctonus adjunctus Blandford (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from the head transcriptome.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Sympatric ecological divergence with coevolution of niche preference.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Conservation of the behavioral and transcriptional response to social experience among Drosophilids.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019Article
- Current source density mapping of antennal sensory selectivity reveals conserved olfactory systems between tephritids and Drosophila.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Patterns of transcriptional parallelism and variation in the developing olfactory system of Drosophila species.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A nonrandom subset of olfactory genes is associated with host preference in the fruit flyEvolution letters · 2017Article
- Candidate chemosensory genes identified in Colaphellus bowringi by antennal transcriptome analysis.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Positive selection in nucleoporins challenges constraints on early expressed genes in Drosophila development.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Female behaviour drives expression and evolution of gustatory receptors in butterflies.PLoS genetics · 2013Article
- Gene duplication as a mechanism of genomic adaptation to a changing environment.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2012Review
- The pectin lyases in Arabidopsis thaliana: evolution, selection and expression profiles.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous comparative genomic studies of genes involved in olfactory behavior in Drosophila focused only on particular gene families such as odorant receptor and/or odorant binding proteins. However, olfactory behavior has a complex genetic architecture that is orchestrated by many interacting genes. In this paper, we present a comparative genomic study of olfactory behavior in Drosophila including an extended set of genes known to affect olfactory behavior. We took advantage of the recent burst of whole genome sequences and the development of powerful statistical tools to analyze genomic data and test evolutionary and functional hypotheses of olfactory genes in the six species of the Drosophila melanogaster species group for which whole genome sequences are available. Our study reveals widespread purifying selection and limited incidence of positive selection on olfactory genes. We show that the pace of evolution of olfactory genes is mostly independent of the life cycle stage, and of the number of life cycle stages, in which they participate in olfaction. However, we detected a relationship between evolutionary rates and the position that the gene products occupy in the olfactory system, genes occupying central positions tend to be more constrained than peripheral genes. Finally, we demonstrate that specialization to one host does not seem to be associated with bursts of adaptive evolution in olfactory genes in D. sechellia and D. erecta, the two specialists species analyzed, but rather different lineages have idiosyncratic evolutionary histories in which both historical and ecological factors have been involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.