Report of the 2010-2011 Professional Affairs Committee: Effective partnerships to implement pharmacists' services in team-based, patient-centered healthcare.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluation of an Interprofessional Academic-Practice Partnership in End of Life Care.Innovations in pharmacy · 2021
   Article
2. Postgraduate pharmacist development- an evaluation of Jordanian pharmacist experiences to inform and shape an evidence-based professional development policy.PloS one · 2021
   Article
3. The Report of the 2018-2019 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: The Role of Educators in Pharmacy Practice Transformation.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019
   Article
4. A logic model for pharmaceutical care.Journal of health services research & policy · 2018
   Article
5. The Report of the 2016-2017 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Formally Embracing and Engaging Preceptors in the Academy - The Time Has Come.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017
   Article
6. Priming the Preceptor Pipeline: Collaboration, Resources, and Recognition: The Report of the 2015-2016 Professional Affairs Standing Committee.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016
   Article
7. Report of the 2014-2015 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Producing Practice-Ready Pharmacy Graduates in an Era of Value-Based Health Care.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2015
   Article
8. Report of the 2012-2013 professional affairs committee: tables of influence-is pharmacy hungry enough?American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2013
   Article
9. Emerging Innovations and Professional Skills Needed Within Pharmacy Curricula.Journal of medical education and curricular development
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as