ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2011
A model for curricular quality assessment and improvement.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Employment of Small-Group Discussions to Ensure the Effective Delivery of Medical Education.Cureus · 2024Review
- Impact of Curricular Integration Between Patient Care Laboratory and Introductory Pharmacy Practice Experience on Documentation.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2020Article
- Quality Assurance and Improvement Practices of Experiential Education Programs in Schools of Pharmacy.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Incorporating ACPE Standards in a Holistic Approach to School Operations and Accreditation.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Measuring Up - Defining the Quality of PharmD Programs.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2017Article
- SAFE QI - a framework to overcome the challenges of implementing a quality improvement curriculum into a residency program.Advances in medical education and practice · 2017Article
- A Process for Curricular Improvement Based on Evaluation of Student Performance on Milestone Examinations.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Using Radar Plots for Curricular Mapping to Visualize Assessment in a New Doctor of Pharmacy Program.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2015Article
- Reenvisioning assessment for the Academy and the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's standards revision process.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2013Article
- Development of a course review process.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article describes a systematic assessment model and its potential application to a college's ongoing curricular assessment activities. Each component of the continuous quality improvement model is discussed, including (1) the definition of a competent practitioner, (2) development of the core curricular competencies and course objectives, (3) students' baseline characteristics and educational attainment, (4) implementation of the curriculum, (5) data collection about the students' actual performance on the curriculum, and (6) reassessment of the model and curricular outcomes. Over time, faculty members involved in curricular assessment should routinely reassess the rationale for selecting outcomes; continually explore reliable and valid methods of assessing whether students have reached their learning goals; get legitimate support for assessment activities from faculty members and administration; routinely review curricular content related to attitudinal, behavioral, and knowledge-learning outcomes; and determine what to do with the collected assessment data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.