ArticleGenetics2012
The genome architecture of the Collaborative Cross mouse genetic reference population.
Article in Genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 345 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
345 citing papers in PubMed, 527 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative insights into the gut-heart axis: cross-species and cross-population perspectives.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Systems genetics analysis reveals immune mediators of coronavirus disease severity in mice.Genetics · 2026Article
- Developing a strain-dependent susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in a murine model based on histopathological evidence and genetic context.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- The promise of long-read RNA-seq: reducing bias in analyses of allele imbalance.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- BCG vaccination elicits protection against M. tuberculosis infection mediated by two phases of T cell immunity.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Genetic context alters central nervous system compartment dependent responses to lipopolysaccharide.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Characterization of an immunocompetent, young adult mouse model for studying chikungunya virus neuroinvasion and central nervous system infection.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Hybrid crosses reveal a cell-type-specific landscape of mouse regulatory variation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Discovery and characterization of gene-by-environment and epistatic genetic effects in a vertebrate model.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Offspring genetic diversity regulates rearing experiences that predict differential susceptibility to Chd8 haploinsufficiency.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Systematic cell-type resolved transcriptomes of 8 tissues in 8 lab and wild-derived mouse strains capture global and local expression variation.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Cross-coronavirus host susceptibility loci influence disease severity through immune mediators.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing facilitates accurate and cost-effective haplotype reconstruction in complex mouse crosses.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2025Article
- Adaptive immune response to West Nile virus infection in the Collaborative Cross mouse model: A database of cellular phenotypes and Quantitative Trait Loci.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Extreme QTL mapping enables the identification of novel zinc toxicity response loci in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics · 2025Article
285 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The Collaborative Cross Consortium reports here on the development of a unique genetic resource population. The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a multiparental recombinant inbred panel derived from eight laboratory mouse inbred strains. Breeding of the CC lines was initiated at multiple international sites using mice from The Jackson Laboratory. Currently, this innovative project is breeding independent CC lines at the University of North Carolina (UNC), at Tel Aviv University (TAU), and at Geniad in Western Australia (GND). These institutions aim to make publicly available the completed CC lines and their genotypes and sequence information. We genotyped, and report here, results from 458 extant lines from UNC, TAU, and GND using a custom genotyping array with 7500 SNPs designed to be maximally informative in the CC and used a novel algorithm to infer inherited haplotypes directly from hybridization intensity patterns. We identified lines with breeding errors and cousin lines generated by splitting incipient lines into two or more cousin lines at early generations of inbreeding. We then characterized the genome architecture of 350 genetically independent CC lines. Results showed that founder haplotypes are inherited at the expected frequency, although we also consistently observed highly significant transmission ratio distortion at specific loci across all three populations. On chromosome 2, there is significant overrepresentation of WSB/EiJ alleles, and on chromosome X, there is a large deficit of CC lines with CAST/EiJ alleles. Linkage disequilibrium decays as expected and we saw no evidence of gametic disequilibrium in the CC population as a whole or in random subsets of the population. Gametic equilibrium in the CC population is in marked contrast to the gametic disequilibrium present in a large panel of classical inbred strains. Finally, we discuss access to the CC population and to the associated raw data describing the genetic structure of individual lines. Integration of rich phenotypic and genomic data over time and across a wide variety of fields will be vital to delivering on one of the key attributes of the CC, a common genetic reference platform for identifying causative variants and genetic networks determining traits in mammals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.