Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22344745›Full record

ReviewGenesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000)2012

The hitchhiker's guide to Xenopus genetics.

Anita Abu-Daya, Mustafa K Khokha, Lyle B Zimmerman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Disruption Studies in FMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. The Zahn drawings: new illustrations ofDevelopment (Cambridge, England) · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anita Abu-DayaDivision of Developmental Biology, MRC-National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, United Kingdom.
Mustafa K Khokha
Lyle B Zimmerman
The Francis Crick Institute · GBYale University · US

Funding

Craniofacial and cardiac development in Xenopus: A genetic approachR01DE018825 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CONLON, FRANK LEO, KHOKHA, MUSTAFA K · 2009 to 2013
$2.3M
Transcriptome Profiling and Targeted Genic Improvement of the X. tropicalis GenomR01GM099149 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHO, KEN W.Y., GILCHRIST, MICHAEL JAMES · 2011 to 2014
$2.0M
A Xenopus tropicalis mutant resourceR01HD054354 · NICHD · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI STEMPLE, DEREK L · 2007 to 2011
$2.0M
Characterization and cloning of X. tropicalis Craniofacial MutantsR01DE018824 · NIDCR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHOKHA, MUSTAFA K · 2008 to 2012
$1.8M
Genetic Analysis of Inner Ear Development in Xenopus tropicalisR01DC011901 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HARLAND, RICHARD M · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Medical Research Council MC_U117560482Medical Research Council U117560482NICHD NIH HHS 1R01 HD054354-01NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054354NIDCD NIH HHS 1R01DC011901-01NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011901NIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE018824NIDCR NIH HHS 1R01DE018825-01A1NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018824NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE018825NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decade after the human genome sequence, most vertebrate gene functions remain poorly understood, limiting benefits to human health from rapidly advancing genomic technologies. Systematic in vivo functional analysis is ideally suited to the experimentally accessible Xenopus embryo, which combines embryological accessibility with a broad range of transgenic, biochemical, and gain-of-function assays. The diploid X. tropicalis adds loss-of-function genetics and enhanced genomics to this repertoire. In the last decade, diverse phenotypes have been recovered from genetic screens, mutations have been cloned, and reverse genetics in the form of TILLING and targeted gene editing have been established. Simple haploid genetics and gynogenesis and the very large number of embryos produced streamline screening and mapping. Improved genomic resources and the revolution in high-throughput sequencing are transforming mutation cloning and reverse genetic approaches. The combination of loss-of-function mutant backgrounds with the diverse array of conventional Xenopus assays offers a uniquely flexible platform for analysis of gene function in vertebrate development.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome MappingEvolution, MolecularGenetic Association StudiesGenetic TestingHumansMutationOrganogenesisXenopus

Identifiers

PMID22344745
PMCPMC3312310
OpenAlexW2012400501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.